Criteria to ensure trustworthiness of research findings
| Measure | Main objectives | Requirements met |
|---|---|---|
| Credibility | To ensure that findings are the true representations | Interviewed respondents from different firms; data triangulated through secondary means |
| Transferability | Findings can be transferred from one context to another | Used multiple case studies to ensure that findings can be transferred to other contexts |
| Dependability | Results would remain the same if the sample is repeated | Strauss and Corbin (1990)’s coding paradigm used: Open, axial and selective coding; Raw quotes provided Coding process facilitated through NVIVO |
| Confirmability | Findings emerge from the data through respondents’ interpretation | Data collected from respondents with expertise on the management of supply chain operations |
| Measure | Main objectives | Requirements met |
|---|---|---|
| Credibility | To ensure that findings are the true representations | Interviewed respondents from different firms; data triangulated through secondary means |
| Transferability | Findings can be transferred from one context to another | Used multiple case studies to ensure that findings can be transferred to other contexts |
| Dependability | Results would remain the same if the sample is repeated | Strauss and Corbin (1990)’s coding paradigm used: Open, axial and selective coding; Raw quotes provided |
| Confirmability | Findings emerge from the data through respondents’ interpretation | Data collected from respondents with expertise on the management of supply chain operations |
Source(s): Authors’ work
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.