Table 4

Reliability and convergent validity: revisit intention model

Standardised loadingCRAVE
EXPE
HEDO0.850***0.8200.514
NOVE0.609***
REFR0.734***
MEAN0.709***
CULT0.532***
IDEN
IDEN20.891***0.8630.681
IDEN30.911***
IDEN40.648***
DEPE
DEPE10.700***0.7770.538
DEPE20.730***
DEPE30.768***
INTE
INTE10.794***0.7840.548
INTE30.745***
INTE40.677***
HOSP
HOSP10.812***0.8910.627
HOSP20.543***
HOSP30.809***
HOSP40.902***
HOSP50.844***

Note(s): HEDO = hedonism; NOVE = novelty; REFR = refreshment; MEAN = meaningfulness; CULT = local culture; IDEN = place identity; DEPE = place dependence; INTE = behavioural intention; HOSP = hospitality. In terms of absolute fit: χ2/df = 2.334 < 5.0; GFI = 0.870 > 0.85 (Schermelleh-Engel et al., 2003); SRMR = 0.078 < 1.0 (Arbuckle, 2007); and RMSEA = 0.060 < 0.08. In terms of incremental fit: AGFI = 0.851 > 0.85 (Schermelleh-Engel et al., 2003); TLI = 0.901 > 0.8, NFI = 0.858 > 0.8, CFI = 0.913 > 0.8 and IFI = 0.914 > 0.8 (Bajoulvand et al., 2019). Lastly, in terms of parsimonious fit: PGFI = 0.711 > 0.5, PNFI = 0.756 > 0.5 and PCFI = 0.804 > 0.5 (Mulaik et al., 1989)

Source(s): Authors’ own creation

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options