Table 4

Hypotheses testing

Path coefficientSEt_value5.00%95.00%VIFf2R2
H1aMW → NFA0.5620.04512.553***0.4890.6351.0000.4630.316
H1bMW → NFC0.4470.0538.485***0.3620.5361.0000.2500.200
H1cMW → NFR0.5040.04311.634***0.4370.581.0000.3410.254
H2aNFA → JE0.1580.0821.934*0.0190.2871.4820.0180.073
H2bNFA → REL0.4730.0548.719***0.3820.5611.4820.2110.283
H2cNFA → WELL0.4660.0587.967***0.3690.5611.4820.1900.231
H2dNFA → WLB0.2800.0733.816***0.1640.4041.4820.0580.093
H3aNFC → JE0.2220.0663.378***0.1190.3341.2470.0430.073
H3bNFC → REL0.0800.0501.595(NS)−0.0010.1661.2470.007 
H3cNFC → WELL0.0070.0580.119(NS)−0.0870.1021.2470.000 
H3dNFC → WLB0.1170.0671.748*0.010.2291.2470.012 
H4aNFR → JE−0.1290.0731.783*−0.251−0.0091.4910.012 
H4bNFR → REL0.0380.0610.622(NS)−0.0590.141.4910.001 
H4cNFR → WELL0.0220.0610.362(NS)−0.0770.1271.4910.000 
H4dNFR → WLB−0.0800.0771.030(NS)−0.2090.0431.4910.005 
H5aJE → WFE0.1130.0681.661*0.0020.2251.2750.0120.182
H5bREL → WFE0.2670.0763.516***0.1360.3871.4960.058 
H5cWELL → WFE0.1930.0643.021**0.090.3011.4360.032 
H5dWLB → WFE−0.0370.0660.559(NS)−0.1430.0731.3890.001 

Note(s): (1) *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001 (one-tailed) (2) WELL = well-being; JE = job effectiveness; MW = meaningful work; NFA = need for autonomy; NFC = need for competence; NFR = need for relatedness; REL = relationship with the organization ; WFE = work–family enrichment; WLB = work–life balance (3) SE = Standard error

Source(s): Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal