Table 2

Effect of leader–follower relational schema on knowledge hiding and felt obligation

VariablesKnowledge hidingFelt obligation
ERSLRSERSLRS
Model 1Model 2Model 3Model 4Model 1Model 2Model 3Model 4
BSEBSEBSEBSEBSEBSEBSEBSE
Constant term2.32**0.032.32***0.032.32**0.032.32***0.033.73***0.043.72***0.043.73***0.043.72***0.04
Leader gender−0.090.07−0.090.07−0.080.07−0.080.070.110.080.080.070.090.070.090.07
Leader age−0.09**0.03−0.08*0.03−0.09**0.03−0.09**0.030.020.030.020.030.030.030.030.03
Leader education0.010.040.010.040.010.040.000.040.000.050.000.040.020.050.010.04
Leader position−0.050.05−0.040.05−0.050.05−0.040.050.010.050.010.040.000.05−0.010.04
Follower gender−0.110.08−0.100.08−0.110.09−0.050.060.040.070.060.060.030.070.020.06
Follower age−0.030.02−0.020.02−0.020.02−0.020.02−0.040.02−0.030.02−0.050.03−0.030.03
Follower education−0.030.03−0.020.03−0.040.04−0.030.030.050.030.030.030.060.030.050.03
Follower work experience−0.030.10−0.040.09−0.040.11−0.100.100.130.080.180.080.130.110.130.10
Dyadic tenure0.010.110.040.100.010.120.090.11−0.070.08−0.140.08−0.070.10−0.090.09
Follower’s relational schema (LE/LI)−0.020.04−0.040.05−0.010.040.010.040.070.040.060.04−0.060.04−0.050.05
Leader’s relational schema (FE/FI)−0.44***0.06−0.56***0.05−0.36**0.10−0.53***0.070.59***0.050.61***0.060.46***0.070.49***0.07
L20.040.040.000.050.020.040.000.04
L*F0.080.06−0.210.08−0.080.050.120.08
F20.20***0.050.18**0.06−0.10*0.05−0.120.08
Consistent line slope a1−0.60***−0.52***0.67***0.45***
Consistent line curvature a20.31***−0.02−0.17**0.00
Inconsistent line slope a30.53***0.54***−0.55***−0.54***
Inconsistent line curvature a40.15*0.39***0.003−0.24**
Note(s):

The table presents unstandardized regression coefficients and standard errors for each measure; values in italics are relevant for tests of hypotheses; *p 0.10; **p 0.05; and ***p 0.001 ERS = expressive relational schema; LRS = instrumental relational schema

Source(s): Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal