Table 8.

Summary of literature on resilient and sustainable CLSCs

Economic
KPIs class
Environmental
KPIs class
Social KPIs
class
Level of decision-
making class
ProductsType of risk
addressed
Resilience
strategy applied
Author & year1231123123Disruption
risk
Operational
risk
Pro-active
resilient strategy
Reactive
resilient
strategy
Afshar et al. (2022) a, b, c, d  g  cbafplasticv  b
Mehrjerdi and Shafiee (2020) a, b, c, d  b, f d b, d  tiresv ec
Momenitabar et al. (2022) a, b, c, d  f, g dc  ftiresv  a, c
Yousefi-Babadi et al. (2021) a, b, c, d  b   a, b  Lighting
projectors
v  c
Baghizadeh et al. (2021) a, b, c, d  g d b  tiresv i 
Chen et al. (2022)  a b  c bfPerishable
products
vv  
Fazli-Khalaf et al. (2021) a, b, c, da g  cb  tiresv  c
Yavari and Zaker (2020) a, b, c, d  g   bbfDairy industryv  a, c
Mehrjerdi and Shafiee (2021) a, b, c, d  b, f d d  tiresv ec
Akbari-Kasgari et al. (2022)  a b,c adb  copperv  c

Note(s): ****For the level of decision-making, the class is obtained from Table 3, where strategic decisions are labelled as class 1, tactical class 2 and operational class 3. The lettering of decisions addressed is obtained from Table 3. Vali-Siar et al. (2022) investigated dynamic pricing and the routing of vehicles under operational decisions. The lettering for the proactive and reactive resilience strategies is also obtained from Table 4. Vali-Siar et al. (2022) used demand management and creating redundancy as resilience strategies in their research

Source(s): Author’s own creation/work

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options