Table 1.

Barriers to reverse logistics covered in the literature

Serial no.RL barriersDescriptionCodeRL sub-barriersReferences
1Management relatedThe competencies, incentives, degree of education and involvement of RL staff, as well as the dedication of senior management to RL methodologiesR1Absence of commitment and accountability from upper managementChileshe et al. (2015); Moktadir et al. (2020); Saruchera and Asante-Darko (2021) 
R2Lack of collaboration with RL professionals and SC partnersAgrawal et al. (2015); Campos et al. (2020); Cricelli et al. (2021); Plaza-Úbeda et al. (2021) 
R3Lack interest among stakeholders for RLBouzon et al. (2016); Prakash and Barua (2015); Waqas et al. (2018) 
R4Resistance to the departure from traditional practicesGomes da Silva and Gouveia (2020); Prakash et al. (2015); Waqas et al. (2018) 
R5Inadequate strategic planning to improve RL implementationsLara et al. (2019); Prajapati et al. (2019); U-Dominic et al. (2021) 
2Economical and financialCapabilities pertaining to economic aspects of RL implementation, such as investments, loans and finance.R6Availability of sufficient and timely capitalAbdulrahman et al. (2014); Agrawal et al. (2016); Bouzon et al. (2018) 
R7Minimal profitabilityAbdulrahman et al. (2014); Bouzon et al. (2018) 
R8Increased expense of adopting RLAbdulrahman et al. (2014); Chileshe et al. (2015) 
R9Uncertainty concerning economic mattersDesticioglu et al. (2022); Sonar et al. (2024) 
3Infrastructure and technologicalPhysical infrastructure, transportation, technology and information systems as they pertain to RLR10Lack of waste management and product recovery technologyAbdulrahman et al. (2014); Al Zaabi et al. (2013) 
R11Insufficient infrastructure and logistics facilitiesCaiado et al. (2022); Muchenje (2024) 
4RegulatoryRL-enabling policies, rules and regulations at multiple levels (municipal, national, regional and worldwide)R12Inadequate government laws and rules for EoL goodsBouzon et al. (2018); Govindan et al. (2014) 
R13Lack of representation from a professional Indian retail apparel bodyDerived in the Delphi survey by the authors
R14Changing regulationsMuduli et al. (2013) 
R15Lack of standards for recycling managementAbdulrahman et al. (2014); Bouzon et al. (2018); Giunipero et al. (2012) 
5Supply chain, governance and operationalEstablished protocols for managing value chain operations and stakeholdersR16Insufficient coordination among supply chain partnersAbdulrahman et al. (2014); Balasubramanian (2012); Prakash and Barua (2015) 
R17Insufficient planning and forecasting in RLAbdulrahman et al. (2014); Agrawal and Singh (2020); Bouzon et al. (2018); Prakash and Barua (2015) 
R18Quality issues of returned productsBouzon et al. (2016); Prakash et al. (2015) 
R19Operational issuesMoktadir et al. (2020) 
6Promotion of remanufactured or recycled productsIn relation to market volatility and competitiveness, the extent of market recovery developmentR20Underdeveloped markets for recoveryBouzon et al. (2018); Starostka-Patyk et al. (2013) 
R21Managing quality uncertainty, return timing and demandJindal and Sangwan (2013; Prakash et al. (2015) 
R22Perceptions of inferior quality productsJindal and Sangwan (2013); Prakash et al. (2015) 
R23Lack of community pressureMeehan and Muir (2008); Muduli et al. (2013); Srivastava (2008) 
7Consumer awarenessConcerning goods returns and the environmental repercussions of improper disposalR24Customer acuity about RLPrakash and Barua (2015) 
Source(s): Authors’ own creation

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal