Table 3.

Integrating sustainability into the curriculum by different levels of HE management based on structural empowerment, psychological empowerment and practical implementation reported by interviewees

Structural empowermentPsychological empowermentPractical implementation
Macro level
Industry and social landscape
Large-sized industry partners: interested in students with sustainability skills and knowledgeNo industry partners are required to provide sustainability education to universities/schools
Small-scale companies are not necessarily paying attention; they are more concerned with business performance pressureSome industry partners and NGOs provided partnership opportunities directly related to sustainability topics through student work-integrated projects
Governance (ministry of education and training)
No direct policy or formal guidance was deliveredGeneral yet unofficial encouragement to teach students sustainability knowledgeNo governance system required sustainability elements when designing the curriculum
Universities
No policy or requirement to integrate sustainability into the curriculum. No scheme to facilitate resources and support for academic staffSome had general yet informal encouragement. The remaining did not provide any statement regarding the practicesVery little training or guidance is provided to academic staff to get a proper and systematic approach
Meso level
Faculty, school, departments
No faculties, schools, or departments made sustainability a mandatory pillar in curriculum design. All meso-level managers did not make mandatory requests for their staff to conductPositive perception of the need for sustainability education for students to benefit multiple stakeholdersSome started to update the curriculum with more sustainability knowledge under the encouragement of the team leader
Programs, courses
Courses and programs with the nature of the industry strongly attached to sustainability issues have more systematic management of curriculum design following industry updatesAcademic staff teaching social sciences or art programs were hesitant because they did not see an explicit connection to their course syllabusCourses highly relevant to sustainability: integration in lecturers and assessments (mandatory requirements). Courses with implicit connection: integration in case studies, assessments (optional requirements), activities and guest sessions
Micro level
Individual lecturers
Not receive any mandatory requirements from the upper-level managementThe majority of staff perceived sustainability education as important for students, industry and societyWhile some proactively updated the curriculum, not all lecturers did so. It was up to personal decisions completely to implement or not
Some interviewees were keen on updating the curriculum with sustainability knowledge, assessments and projects and willing to spend their own time, effort and resources to do so without formal requestSome wanted to start updating the curriculum, but they did not know where to start, especially in courses with limited connection to the environment
Source(s): Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal