Table 3. Parameter estimates for direct... | Emerald Publishing

Table 3.

Parameter estimates for direct effects (model 3)

Paths	Unstandardised		Standardised	Critical ratio	p-value
Paths	Estimate	S.E.	Estimate	Critical ratio	p-value
IPSC → PEN	0.58	0.03	0.58	19.08	<0.01
PEN → PEB	0.61	0.03	0.64	21.32	<0.01
IPSC → PEB	0.19	0.03	0.20	6.73	<0.01
Gender → PEN	−0.26	0.05	−0.16	−5.31	<0.01
Gender → PEB	−0.09	0.04	−0.06	−2.33	0.02
Age → PEN	0.02	0.00	0.12	3.91	<0.01
Age → PEB	−0.00	0.00	0.01	−0.26	0.80
IO → PEN	0.06	0.05	0.04	1.16	0.25
IO → PEB	−0.04	0.04	−0.02	−0.97	0.33
WO → PEN	−0.13	0.05	−0.08	−2.47	0.01
WO → PEB	0.04	0.04	0.02	0.96	0.34

Paths	Unstandardised		Standardised	Critical ratio	p-value
Paths	Estimate	S.E.	Estimate	Critical ratio	p-value
IPSC → PEN	0.58	0.03	0.58	19.08	<0.01
PEN → PEB	0.61	0.03	0.64	21.32	<0.01
IPSC → PEB	0.19	0.03	0.20	6.73	<0.01
Gender → PEN	−0.26	0.05	−0.16	−5.31	<0.01
Gender → PEB	−0.09	0.04	−0.06	−2.33	0.02
Age → PEN	0.02	0.00	0.12	3.91	<0.01
Age → PEB	−0.00	0.00	0.01	−0.26	0.80
IO → PEN	0.06	0.05	0.04	1.16	0.25
IO → PEB	−0.04	0.04	−0.02	−0.97	0.33
WO → PEN	−0.13	0.05	−0.08	−2.47	0.01
WO → PEB	0.04	0.04	0.02	0.96	0.34

Note(s):

n = 713; gender (1=male, 0 = female), age (in years), IO = internship opportunities (1 = yes, 0 = no) WO = work opportunities (1=yes, 0 = no)

Source(s): Authors’ own work