Table A10.

Configurations for improving university performance – Australia

Models for high UPERCUCCModels for low UPERCUCC
Model1a: UPE = f(RES*PRO*PEO)Model1b: ∼UPE = f(RES*PRO*PEO)
1. RES*PRO*PEO0.5670.5670.9031. RES*PRO*PEO0.3850.3850.521
Solution coverage: 0.567
Solution consistency: 0.903
Solution coverage: 0.385
Solution consistency: 0.521
Model2a: UPE = f(NVE*INN*SEL*PRT)Model2b: ∼ UPE = f(NVE*INN*SEL*PRT)
1. ∼NVE*INN*SEL*∼PRT0.2540.0780.9641. ∼NVE*∼INN*∼SEL*∼PRT0.6350.6350.912
2. NVE*INN*SEL*PRT0.6090.4330.844    
Solution coverage: 0.688
Solution consistency: 0.859
Solution coverage: 0.635
Solution consistency: 0.912
Model3a: UPE = f(RES*PRO*PEO*NVE*INN*SEL*PRT)Model3b: ∼ UPE = f(RES*PRO*PEO*NVE*INN*SEL*PRT)
1. RES*PRO*PEO*NVE*INN*SEL*PRT0.5070.4100.9561. ∼PRO*∼PEO*∼NVE*∼INN*∼SEL*∼PRT0.5530.4200.918
    2. ∼RES*∼PRO*∼PEO*NVE*INN*SEL*PRT0.2210.0880.892
Solution coverage: 0.594
Solution consistency: 0.947
Solution coverage: 0.642
Solution consistency: 0.898

Note(s): RC = raw coverage; UC = unique coverage; C = consistency; RES = resource; PRO = process; PEO = people; NVE = new venture behaviour; INN = innovativeness; SEL = self-renewal; PRT = proactiveness; UPE = university performance. RC >0.2 are reported

Source(s): Authors’ own creation/work

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options