Configurations for improving university performance – Mexico
| Models for high UPE | RC | UC | C | Models for low UPE | RC | UC | C | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model1a: UPE = f(RES*PRO*PEO) | Model1b: ∼UPE = f(RES*PRO*PEO) | |||||||
| 1. ∼RES*PRO*PEO | 0.305 | 0.305 | 0.809 | 1. ∼RES*PRO*PEO | 0.260 | 0.260 | 0.748 | |
| Solution coverage: 0.305 Solution consistency: 0.809 | Solution coverage: 0.260 Solution consistency: 0.748 | |||||||
| Model2a: UPE = f(NVE*INN*SEL*PRT) | Model2b: ∼ UPE = f(NVE*INN*SEL*PRT) | |||||||
| 1. NVE*INN | 0.702 | 0.110 | 0.814 | 1. ∼NVE*∼INN*∼SEL*∼PRT | 0.608 | 0.608 | 0.818 | |
| 2. INN*PRT | 0.633 | 0.042 | 0.794 | |||||
| Solution coverage: 0.744 Solution consistency: 0.802 | Solution coverage: 0.608 Solution consistency: 0.818 | |||||||
| Model3a: UPE = f(RES*PRO*PEO*NVE*INN*SEL*PRT) | Model3b: ∼ UPE = f(RES*PRO*PEO*NVE*INN*SEL*PRT) | |||||||
| 1. ∼RES*∼PRO*∼PEO*INN*SEL*∼PRT | 0.262 | 0.107 | 0.805 | 1. ∼PRO*∼PEO*∼NVE*∼INN*∼SEL*∼PRT | 0.442 | 0.170 | 0.829 | |
| 2. RES*PRO*PEO*∼NVE*INN*SEL*PRT | 0.231 | 0.070 | 0.835 | 2. RES*∼PRO*∼NVE*∼INN*∼SEL*∼PRT | 0.301 | 0.033 | 0.847 | |
| Solution coverage: 0.381 Solution consistency: 0.800 | Solution coverage: 0.528 Solution consistency: 0.848 | |||||||
| Models for high UPE | RC | UC | C | Models for low UPE | RC | UC | C | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model1a: UPE = f(RES*PRO*PEO) | Model1b: ∼UPE = f(RES*PRO*PEO) | |||||||
| 1. ∼RES*PRO*PEO | 0.305 | 0.305 | 0.809 | 1. ∼RES*PRO*PEO | 0.260 | 0.260 | 0.748 | |
| Solution coverage: 0.305 | Solution coverage: 0.260 | |||||||
| Model2a: UPE = f(NVE*INN*SEL*PRT) | Model2b: ∼ UPE = f(NVE*INN*SEL*PRT) | |||||||
| 1. NVE*INN | 0.702 | 0.110 | 0.814 | 1. ∼NVE*∼INN*∼SEL*∼PRT | 0.608 | 0.608 | 0.818 | |
| 2. INN*PRT | 0.633 | 0.042 | 0.794 | |||||
| Solution coverage: 0.744 | Solution coverage: 0.608 | |||||||
| Model3a: UPE = f(RES*PRO*PEO*NVE*INN*SEL*PRT) | Model3b: ∼ UPE = f(RES*PRO*PEO*NVE*INN*SEL*PRT) | |||||||
| 1. ∼RES*∼PRO*∼PEO*INN*SEL*∼PRT | 0.262 | 0.107 | 0.805 | 1. ∼PRO*∼PEO*∼NVE*∼INN*∼SEL*∼PRT | 0.442 | 0.170 | 0.829 | |
| 2. RES*PRO*PEO*∼NVE*INN*SEL*PRT | 0.231 | 0.070 | 0.835 | 2. RES*∼PRO*∼NVE*∼INN*∼SEL*∼PRT | 0.301 | 0.033 | 0.847 | |
| Solution coverage: 0.381 | Solution coverage: 0.528 | |||||||
Note(s): RC = raw coverage; UC = unique coverage; C = consistency; RES = resource; PRO = process; PEO = people; NVE = new venture behaviour; INN = innovativeness; SEL = self-renewal; PRT = proactiveness; UPE = university performance. RC >0.2 are reported
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.