Table 4.

Regression results on the impact of board gender diversity on the number of assurance procedures used

Assurance procedures (APs)(1)(2)(3)
H1H2H3
BGD0.052***(6.051)−0.006 (−0.299)0.031*** (2.905)
BGD × LOA 0.056***(3.634) 
BGD × TYPEAUD  0.031***(2.813)
LOA0.541** (2.186)−0.367 (−1.105)0.620** (2.499)
TYPEAUD1.499*** (8.797)1.541*** (9.086)0.817*** (2.972)
BIND−0.016*** (−3.973)−0.017*** (−4.085)−0.017*** (−4.161)
FSIZE0.026 (0.532)0.036 (0.713)0.028 (0.572)
ROIC−0.020*** (−3.211)−0.020*** (−3.219)−0.018*** (−2.833)
TDTC−0.013*** (−4.108)−0.011*** (−3.752)−0.013*** (−4.165)
BSIZE−0.017 (−0.761)−0.017 (−0.766)−0.010 (−0.467)
CEOD0.584*** (3.560)0.622*** (3.784)0.614*** (3.743)
AUDITCEXP−0.062 (−0.280)−0.009 (−0.039)0.001 (0.005)
NOA0.559*** (3.140)0.614*** (3.426)0.485*** (2.741)
GOV−0.005 (−1.143)−0.005 (−1.154)−0.005 (−1.132)
Constant5.296*** (4.077)5.943*** (4.520)5.662*** (4.373)
Observations114811481148
Adj R20.2550.2610.260
F-stat14.86214.83814.569
Year dummiesYesYesYes
Industry dummiesYesYesYes

Note(s):t-values are in parentheses; ***p < 0.01, **p < 0.05, *p < 0.1

Source(s): Authors’ own creation

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal