Table A3. PLS structural model results...

Table A3.

PLS structural model results with control paths on paradox mindset: path coefficients, standard deviation (SD), p-values and f² (n = 72)

Paths:			Hypothesis/control	Path coefficient	SD	p-Value	f²
From:		To:	Hypothesis/control	Path coefficient	SD	p-Value	f²
Goal-setting participation	→	Experiencing tensions	H1	−0.359	0.127	0.002**	0.148
Experiencing tensions	→	Budgetary performance	H2	0.229	0.149	0.092	0.045
Paradox mindset * Experiencing tensions	→	Budgetary performance	H3	0.569	0.119	0.000***	0.179
Paradox mindset	→	Budgetary performance	Control	0.266	0.074	0.000***	0.297
Age	→	Experiencing tensions	Control	0.048	0.132	0.719	0.002
Age	→	Paradox mindset	Control	−0.017	0.112	0.878	0.000
Age	→	Budgetary performance	Control	0.11	0.089	0.214	0.019
Gender⁺	→	Experiencing tensions	Control	−0.411	0.256	0.108	0.037
Gender⁺	→	Paradox mindset	Control	−0.266	0.304	0.381	0.014
Gender⁺	→	Budgetary performance	Control	0.154	0.218	0.481	0.008
Tenure	→	Experiencing tensions	Control	−0.084	0.135	0.533	0.006
Tenure	→	Paradox mindset	Control	−0.017	0.126	0.895	0.000
Tenure	→	Budgetary performance	Control	0.051	0.138	0.715	0.004
Size (ln)	→	Experiencing tensions	Control	0.119	0.114	0.300	0.016
Size (ln)	→	Paradox mindset	Control	0.232	0.136	0.089	0.054
Size (ln)	→	Budgetary performance	Control	−0.031	0.11	0.776	0.002
Dip_1⁺⁺	→	Experiencing tensions	Control	−0.19	0.281	0.501	0.007
Dip_1⁺⁺	→	Paradox mindset	Control	−0.31	0.35	0.375	0.018
Dip_1⁺⁺	→	Budgetary performance	Control	0.096	0.231	0.679	0.003
Dip_2⁺⁺	→	Experiencing tensions	Control	−0.247	0.376	0.511	0.007
Dip_2⁺⁺	→	Paradox mindset	Control	−0.318	0.409	0.437	0.01
Dip_2⁺⁺	→	Budgetary performance	Control	0.082	0.252	0.745	0.001

Paths:			Hypothesis/control	Path coefficient	SD	p-Value	f²
From:		To:	Hypothesis/control	Path coefficient	SD	p-Value	f²
Goal-setting participation	→	Experiencing tensions	H1	−0.359	0.127	0.002**	0.148
Experiencing tensions	→	Budgetary performance	H2	0.229	0.149	0.092	0.045
Paradox mindset * Experiencing tensions	→	Budgetary performance	H3	0.569	0.119	0.000***	0.179
Paradox mindset	→	Budgetary performance	Control	0.266	0.074	0.000***	0.297
Age	→	Experiencing tensions	Control	0.048	0.132	0.719	0.002
Age	→	Paradox mindset	Control	−0.017	0.112	0.878	0.000
Age	→	Budgetary performance	Control	0.11	0.089	0.214	0.019
Gender⁺	→	Experiencing tensions	Control	−0.411	0.256	0.108	0.037
Gender⁺	→	Paradox mindset	Control	−0.266	0.304	0.381	0.014
Gender⁺	→	Budgetary performance	Control	0.154	0.218	0.481	0.008
Tenure	→	Experiencing tensions	Control	−0.084	0.135	0.533	0.006
Tenure	→	Paradox mindset	Control	−0.017	0.126	0.895	0.000
Tenure	→	Budgetary performance	Control	0.051	0.138	0.715	0.004
Size (ln)	→	Experiencing tensions	Control	0.119	0.114	0.300	0.016
Size (ln)	→	Paradox mindset	Control	0.232	0.136	0.089	0.054
Size (ln)	→	Budgetary performance	Control	−0.031	0.11	0.776	0.002
Dip_1⁺⁺	→	Experiencing tensions	Control	−0.19	0.281	0.501	0.007
Dip_1⁺⁺	→	Paradox mindset	Control	−0.31	0.35	0.375	0.018
Dip_1⁺⁺	→	Budgetary performance	Control	0.096	0.231	0.679	0.003
Dip_2⁺⁺	→	Experiencing tensions	Control	−0.247	0.376	0.511	0.007
Dip_2⁺⁺	→	Paradox mindset	Control	−0.318	0.409	0.437	0.01
Dip_2⁺⁺	→	Budgetary performance	Control	0.082	0.252	0.745	0.001

Note(s): *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001 (one-tailed test for hypotheses and a two-tailed test for control paths). ⁺ Male and ⁺⁺Dep 3 = reference category

Source(s): Authors’ own creation

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable