Descriptive statistics and psychometric information for Level 1 and Level 2 constructs
| # | Construct | Mean (SD) | α | Min | Max | Correlations | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||||||
| Level 1 (n = 84) | |||||||||||
| 1> | Perceived brand globalness – PBG | 4.92 (1.73) | 0.80 | 1.00 | 7.00 | 1.00 | |||||
| 2 | Perceived brand localness – PBL | 4.02 (1.66) | 0.71 | 1.00 | 7.00 | −0.51*** | 1.00 | ||||
| 3 | Brand familiarity | 5.37 (1.39) | – | 1.00 | 7.00 | 0.07 | 0.26** | 1.00 | |||
| 4 | Brand attitude | 5.33 (1.35) | 0.87 | 1.00 | 7.00 | −0.03 | 0.36*** | 0.42*** | 1.00 | ||
| 5 | Gender | 0.45 (0.50) | – | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 | 0.05 | −0.04 | 0.08 | 1.00 | |
| 6 | Age | 34.94 (13.40) | – | 21.00 | 83.00 | −0.09 | 0.09 | 0.22** | 0.09 | 0.07 | 1.00 |
| Level 2 (n = 10) | |||||||||||
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | ||||||
| 8 | Brand origin stereotype – warmth | 0.30 (0.67) | – | 0 | 2 | 1.00 | |||||
| 9 | Brand origin stereotype – competence | 2.00 (3.09) | – | 0 | 10 | −0.05 | 1.00 | ||||
| 10 | Brand stereotype – warmth | 1.80 (1.73) | – | 0 | 6 | −0.46 | −0.35 | 1.00 | |||
| 11 | Brand stereotype – competence | 7.60 (1.26) | – | 5 | 10 | 0.16 | 0.17 | −0.72** | 1.00 | ||
| 12 | Brand buyer/user stereotype – warmth | 3.10 (2.33) | – | 0 | 8 | −0.37 | −0.32 | 0.25 | −0.44 | 1.00 | |
| 13 | Brand buyer/user stereotype – competence | 1.30 (1.06) | – | 0 | 3 | 0.02 | 0.68** | −0.40 | 0.35 | −0.60* | 1.00 |
| Construct | Mean (SD) | α | Min | Max | Correlations | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |||||||
| 4.92 (1.73) | 0.80 | 1.00 | 7.00 | 1.00 | |||||||
| 4.02 (1.66) | 0.71 | 1.00 | 7.00 | −0.51 | 1.00 | ||||||
| 5.37 (1.39) | – | 1.00 | 7.00 | 0.07 | 0.26 | 1.00 | |||||
| 5.33 (1.35) | 0.87 | 1.00 | 7.00 | −0.03 | 0.36 | 0.42 | 1.00 | ||||
| 0.45 (0.50) | – | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 | 0.05 | −0.04 | 0.08 | 1.00 | |||
| 34.94 (13.40) | – | 21.00 | 83.00 | −0.09 | 0.09 | 0.22 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 1.00 | ||
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | |||||||
| 0.30 (0.67) | – | 0 | 2 | 1.00 | |||||||
| 2.00 (3.09) | – | 0 | 10 | −0.05 | 1.00 | ||||||
| 1.80 (1.73) | – | 0 | 6 | −0.46 | −0.35 | 1.00 | |||||
| 7.60 (1.26) | – | 5 | 10 | 0.16 | 0.17 | −0.72 | 1.00 | ||||
| 3.10 (2.33) | – | 0 | 8 | −0.37 | −0.32 | 0.25 | −0.44 | 1.00 | |||
| 1.30 (1.06) | – | 0 | 3 | 0.02 | 0.68 | −0.40 | 0.35 | −0.60* | 1.00 | ||
α = Cronbach’s alpha; ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.05 and *p < 0.1; two-tailed significance test; Level 2 constructs coding addressed the presence/absence of the stereotype dimension in an ad, and since 10 ads of each brand were evaluated, the relevant range is from 0 to 10