Co-opted directors and climate risk disclosure – difference-in-differences analysis
| Panel A: Comparison of treatment and control firms | ||||||
| Dependent variables | N | Treated | N | Control | Differences | t-statistics |
| Total climate risk disclosure | 231 | 0.130 | 231 | 0.101 | 0.028** | 2.05 |
| Control variables | N | Treated | N | Control | Differences | t-statistics |
| BGD | 231 | 0.194 | 231 | 0.194 | −0.001 | −0.06 |
| Ln_BSIZE | 231 | 2.405 | 231 | 2.393 | 0.012 | 0.70 |
| CEO Board Member | 231 | 0.931 | 231 | 0.948 | −0.017 | −0.78 |
| GOV Index | 231 | 0.617 | 231 | 0.625 | −0.008 | −0.44 |
| ROA | 231 | 0.056 | 231 | 0.062 | −0.007 | −1.50 |
| Sales Growth | 231 | 0.023 | 231 | 0.019 | 0.004 | 0.33 |
| MTB | 231 | 1.790 | 231 | 1.895 | −0.106 | −1.34 |
| Ln_Firm Size | 231 | 9.454 | 231 | 9.533 | −0.079 | −0.78 |
| CAPX_AT | 231 | 0.054 | 231 | 0.049 | 0.005 | 1.03 |
| Leverage | 231 | 0.295 | 231 | 0.284 | 0.012 | 0.82 |
| Cash Holding | 231 | 0.109 | 231 | 0.121 | −0.011 | −1.03 |
| R&D_AT | 231 | 0.013 | 231 | 0.015 | −0.002 | −0.90 |
| M&A | 231 | 0.294 | 231 | 0.355 | −0.061 | −1.39 |
| Ln FAGE | 231 | 2.166 | 231 | 2.203 | −0.037 | −0.28 |
| Panel B: Co-opted directors and climate risk disclosure − DiD regression | ||||||
| Total climate risk disclosure | ||||||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | |||
| Co-optiont * 2-Year POST CEO Turnover | 0.070* (1.75) | |||||
| Co-option (TW)t * 2-Year POST CEO Turnover | 0.100** (2.33) | |||||
| Co-option (Independence)t * 2-Year POST CEO Turnover | 0.067 (1.53) | |||||
| Co-option (TW Independence)t * 2-Year POST CEO Turnover | 0.096* (1.95) | |||||
| Co-optiont | −0.054* (−1.80) | |||||
| Co-option (TW)t | −0.071** (−2.47) | |||||
| Co-option (Independence)t | −0.050 (−1.59) | |||||
| Co-option (TW Independence)t | −0.068** (−1.96) | |||||
| Two-year POST CEO Turnover | −0.012 (−0.70) | −0.005 (−0.40) | −0.008 (−0.45) | −0.002 (−0.13) | ||
| All other controls | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||
| State FE | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||
| Industry FE | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||
| Year FE | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||
| Observations | 462 | 462 | 462 | 462 | ||
| Adjusted R2 | 0.264 | 0.267 | 0.263 | 0.264 | ||
| Panel A: | ||||||
| Dependent variables | Treated | Control | Differences | |||
| 231 | 0.130 | 231 | 0.101 | 0.028 | 2.05 | |
| Control variables | Treated | Control | Differences | |||
| 231 | 0.194 | 231 | 0.194 | −0.001 | −0.06 | |
| 231 | 2.405 | 231 | 2.393 | 0.012 | 0.70 | |
| 231 | 0.931 | 231 | 0.948 | −0.017 | −0.78 | |
| 231 | 0.617 | 231 | 0.625 | −0.008 | −0.44 | |
| 231 | 0.056 | 231 | 0.062 | −0.007 | −1.50 | |
| 231 | 0.023 | 231 | 0.019 | 0.004 | 0.33 | |
| 231 | 1.790 | 231 | 1.895 | −0.106 | −1.34 | |
| 231 | 9.454 | 231 | 9.533 | −0.079 | −0.78 | |
| 231 | 0.054 | 231 | 0.049 | 0.005 | 1.03 | |
| 231 | 0.295 | 231 | 0.284 | 0.012 | 0.82 | |
| 231 | 0.109 | 231 | 0.121 | −0.011 | −1.03 | |
| 231 | 0.013 | 231 | 0.015 | −0.002 | −0.90 | |
| 231 | 0.294 | 231 | 0.355 | −0.061 | −1.39 | |
| 231 | 2.166 | 231 | 2.203 | −0.037 | −0.28 | |
| Total climate risk disclosure | ||||||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | |||
| 0.070 | ||||||
| 0.100 | ||||||
| 0.067 (1.53) | ||||||
| 0.096 | ||||||
| −0.054 | ||||||
| −0.071 | ||||||
| −0.050 (−1.59) | ||||||
| −0.068 | ||||||
| −0.012 (−0.70) | −0.005 (−0.40) | −0.008 (−0.45) | −0.002 (−0.13) | |||
| All other controls | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||
| State FE | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||
| Industry FE | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||
| Year FE | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||
| Observations | 462 | 462 | 462 | 462 | ||
| Adjusted | 0.264 | 0.267 | 0.263 | 0.264 | ||
This table presents regression results for the relationship between co-opted directors and climate risk disclosure using difference in difference (DiD) around CEO exogenous turnover. Panel A presents the univariate mean comparisons between treatment and control firms’ characteristics and their corresponding t-statistics. Panel B presents the results of DiD regressions on the matched sample. All regressions incorporate controls for the fixed effects of state, industry and years. The t-statistics indicated in the parentheses are computed using standard errors cluster at firm-year. The significance levels are denoted by ***(1% significance level), **(5% significance level) and *(10% significance level)
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.