Table 3 Results of discriminant validity... | Emerald Publishing

Table 3

Results of discriminant validity analysis

Serial number	Constructs	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9
1	AGL	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
2	ASP	0.197	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
3	BOR	0.586	0.161	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
4	FLX	0.875	0.213	0.629	–	–	–	–	–	–
5	GOV	0.484	0.313	0.293	0.323	–	–	–	–	–
6	OPP	0.233	0.258	0.413	0.309	0.298		–	–	–
7	TRF	0.190	0.175	0.196	0.167	0.832	0.214	–	–	–
8	UNC	0.405	0.561	0.425	0.253	0.278	0.505	0.306	–
9	VIS	0.815	0.115	0.623	0.902	0.425	0.360	0.164	0.225	–

Serial number	Constructs	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9
1	AGL	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
2	ASP	0.197	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
3	BOR	0.586	0.161	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
4	FLX	0.875	0.213	0.629	–	–	–	–	–	–
5	GOV	0.484	0.313	0.293	0.323	–	–	–	–	–
6	OPP	0.233	0.258	0.413	0.309	0.298		–	–	–
7	TRF	0.190	0.175	0.196	0.167	0.832	0.214	–	–	–
8	UNC	0.405	0.561	0.425	0.253	0.278	0.505	0.306	–
9	VIS	0.815	0.115	0.623	0.902	0.425	0.360	0.164	0.225	–

Note(s): Method -Hetrotrait-monotrait ratio(HTMT)

Source(s): Authors’ own work)