Results of discriminant validity analysis
| Serial number | Constructs | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AGL | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 2 | ASP | 0.197 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 3 | BOR | 0.586 | 0.161 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 4 | FLX | 0.875 | 0.213 | 0.629 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 5 | GOV | 0.484 | 0.313 | 0.293 | 0.323 | – | – | – | – | – |
| 6 | OPP | 0.233 | 0.258 | 0.413 | 0.309 | 0.298 | – | – | – | |
| 7 | TRF | 0.190 | 0.175 | 0.196 | 0.167 | 0.832 | 0.214 | – | – | – |
| 8 | UNC | 0.405 | 0.561 | 0.425 | 0.253 | 0.278 | 0.505 | 0.306 | – | |
| 9 | VIS | 0.815 | 0.115 | 0.623 | 0.902 | 0.425 | 0.360 | 0.164 | 0.225 | – |
| Serial number | Constructs | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AGL | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 2 | ASP | 0.197 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 3 | BOR | 0.586 | 0.161 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 4 | FLX | 0.875 | 0.213 | 0.629 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 5 | GOV | 0.484 | 0.313 | 0.293 | 0.323 | – | – | – | – | – |
| 6 | OPP | 0.233 | 0.258 | 0.413 | 0.309 | 0.298 | – | – | – | |
| 7 | TRF | 0.190 | 0.175 | 0.196 | 0.167 | 0.832 | 0.214 | – | – | – |
| 8 | UNC | 0.405 | 0.561 | 0.425 | 0.253 | 0.278 | 0.505 | 0.306 | – | |
| 9 | VIS | 0.815 | 0.115 | 0.623 | 0.902 | 0.425 | 0.360 | 0.164 | 0.225 | – |
Note(s): Method -Hetrotrait-monotrait ratio(HTMT)
Source(s): Authors’ own work)