Differences in least developed leadership competencies between cohorts
| Cohort 12 | Cohort 22 | Cohort 32 | Cohort 41, 2 | Cohort 52 | F-value | p-value | Eta (η) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fall term | ||||||||
| Commitment to serving | 0.227 | 0.200 | 0.131 | – | 0.219 | 1.62 | 0.189 | 0.206 |
| Practicing citizenship | 0.193 | 0.342 | 0.234 | – | 0.341 | 2.49 | 0.064 | 0.252 |
| Developing teams | 0.336a, b | 0.296a, b | 0.242a | – | 0.389b | 2.94 | 0.036 | 0.272 |
| Winter term | ||||||||
| Developing teams | 0.318 | 0.452 | 0.288 | 0.268 | 0.364 | 2.64 | 0.037 | 0.277 |
| Ethical behavior | 0.318 | 0.309 | 0.288 | 0.302 | 0.438 | 2.17 | 0.076 | 0.253 |
| Commitment to serving | 0.328 | 0.335 | 0.307 | 0.348 | 0.364 | 0.312 | 0.870 | 0.099 |
| Spring term | ||||||||
| Commitment to serving | 0.451a | 0.340a, b | 0.251b | 0.485a | 0.483a | 5.03 | 0.001 | 0.384 |
| Developing teams | 0.327a | 0.379a | 0.320a | 0.580b | 0.473a, b | 5.99 | 0.000 | 0.414 |
| Practicing citizenship | 0.458a, b | 0.368a, b | 0.240a | 0.540b | 0.549b | 6.95 | 0.000 | 0.440 |
| Cohort 1 | Cohort 2 | Cohort 3 | Cohort 4 | Cohort 5 | Eta | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fall term | ||||||||
| Commitment to serving | 0.227 | 0.200 | 0.131 | – | 0.219 | 1.62 | 0.189 | 0.206 |
| Practicing citizenship | 0.193 | 0.342 | 0.234 | – | 0.341 | 2.49 | 0.064 | 0.252 |
| Developing teams | 0.336 | 0.296 | 0.242 | – | 0.389 | 2.94 | 0.036 | 0.272 |
| Winter term | ||||||||
| Developing teams | 0.318 | 0.452 | 0.288 | 0.268 | 0.364 | 2.64 | 0.037 | 0.277 |
| Ethical behavior | 0.318 | 0.309 | 0.288 | 0.302 | 0.438 | 2.17 | 0.076 | 0.253 |
| Commitment to serving | 0.328 | 0.335 | 0.307 | 0.348 | 0.364 | 0.312 | 0.870 | 0.099 |
| Spring term | ||||||||
| Commitment to serving | 0.451 | 0.340 | 0.251 | 0.485 | 0.483 | 5.03 | 0.001 | 0.384 |
| Developing teams | 0.327 | 0.379 | 0.320 | 0.580 | 0.473 | 5.99 | 0.000 | 0.414 |
| Practicing citizenship | 0.458 | 0.368 | 0.240 | 0.540 | 0.549 | 6.95 | 0.000 | 0.440 |
Note(s): *Statistical significance was set at 0.05
No data exists for Fall Term Cohort 4
Mean summative score indicates how many times, on average, students marked that they felt an activity developed the leadership area. Means have been adjusted to unit averages for comparison.
Meanswith different letter superscripts in each row are significant at p < 0.05 based on Tamahane’s T2 post-hoc tests for unequalvariances and Scheffe’s post-hoc tests for equal variances.
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.