Table 4

Differences in least developed leadership competencies between cohorts

Cohort 12Cohort 22Cohort 32Cohort 41, 2Cohort 52F-valuep-valueEta (η)
Fall term
Commitment to serving0.2270.2000.131–0.2191.620.1890.206
Practicing citizenship0.1930.3420.234–0.3412.490.0640.252
Developing teams0.336a, b0.296a, b0.242a–0.389b2.940.0360.272
Winter term
Developing teams0.3180.4520.2880.2680.3642.640.0370.277
Ethical behavior0.3180.3090.2880.3020.4382.170.0760.253
Commitment to serving0.3280.3350.3070.3480.3640.3120.8700.099
Spring term
Commitment to serving0.451a0.340a, b0.251b0.485a0.483a5.030.0010.384
Developing teams0.327a0.379a0.320a0.580b0.473a, b5.990.0000.414
Practicing citizenship0.458a, b0.368a, b0.240a0.540b0.549b6.950.0000.440

Note(s): *Statistical significance was set at 0.05

1

No data exists for Fall Term Cohort 4

2

Mean summative score indicates how many times, on average, students marked that they felt an activity developed the leadership area. Means have been adjusted to unit averages for comparison.

a, b, c

Meanswith different letter superscripts in each row are significant at p < 0.05 based on Tamahane’s T2 post-hoc tests for unequalvariances and Scheffe’s post-hoc tests for equal variances.

Source(s): The authors

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options