Table 1 Heuristic Example Comparing... | Emerald Publishing

Table 1

Heuristic Example Comparing Results Across Studies

						Lower Upper
Study	n	t	P	Decision	d	95%	CI for d
1	33	1.90	0.067	NS	0.33	-0.02	0.68
2	120	1.20	0.231	NS	0.11	-0.07	0.29
3	35	1.72	0.095	NS	0.29	-0.05	0.63
4	50	-2.62	0.012	***	-0.37	-0.65	-0.08
5	37	1.09	0.281	NS	0.18	-0.15	0.50
6	39	1.81	0.078	NS	0.29	-0.03	0.61
7	99	1.49	0.139	NS	0.15	-0.05	0.35
8	6	2.40	0.062	NS	0.98	-0.04	1.94
9	40	1.71	0.096	NS	0.27	-0.05	0.58
10	37	1.89	0.067	NS	0.31	-0.02	0.64
Previous studies
combined	496	3.44	0.001	***	0.16	0.07	0.24
Kulm et al. (2007)	105	8.40	<0.00	***	0.82	0.60	1.04
Kulm et al. & previous studies combined	601	6.64	<0.00	***	0.27	0.19	0.35

						Lower Upper
Study	n	t	P	Decision	d	95%	CI for d
1	33	1.90	0.067	NS	0.33	-0.02	0.68
2	120	1.20	0.231	NS	0.11	-0.07	0.29
3	35	1.72	0.095	NS	0.29	-0.05	0.63
4	50	-2.62	0.012	***	-0.37	-0.65	-0.08
5	37	1.09	0.281	NS	0.18	-0.15	0.50
6	39	1.81	0.078	NS	0.29	-0.03	0.61
7	99	1.49	0.139	NS	0.15	-0.05	0.35
8	6	2.40	0.062	NS	0.98	-0.04	1.94
9	40	1.71	0.096	NS	0.27	-0.05	0.58
10	37	1.89	0.067	NS	0.31	-0.02	0.64
Previous studies
combined	496	3.44	0.001	***	0.16	0.07	0.24
Kulm et al. (2007)	105	8.40	<0.00	***	0.82	0.60	1.04
Kulm et al. & previous studies combined	601	6.64	<0.00	***	0.27	0.19	0.35

Note. NS indicates non-statistically significant results.