Theories and concepts of CSR according to experts and scientists
| No. | Authors | Concepts |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | GRI |
|
| 2 | Gray |
|
| 3 | Carroll | Carroll provides CSR limitations with a responsibility approach consisting of economic responsibility, legal responsibility, ethical responsibility and philanthropic responsibility. Carroll describes CSR into four dimensions known as CSR pyramids (Carroll, 1991) |
| 4 | Elkington |
|
| No. | Authors | Concepts |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The 2016 Global Reporting Initiative ( A total of 79 performance indicators, consisting of 9 economic indicators, 30 environmental indicators, 14 labour practice indicators, 9 human rights indicators, 8 social or community indicators and 9 product responsibility indicators (Global Reporting Initiative (GRI, 2010: 23). | |
| 2 | Gray | Stakeholder theory shows that companies operate for their own interests, but must provide benefits to their stakeholders, namely, shareholders, creditors, consumers, suppliers, government, community analysts and other parties (Gray To meet the wishes of stakeholders, corporate social responsibility can be one of the company’s strategies. |
| 3 | Carroll | Carroll provides |
| 4 | Elkington | Elkington is the founder of the Corporate social responsibility and sustainable development, in the 'triple bottom line’ namely the existence of the 3P (Profit, People, Planet) formulation, or referred to as the “three pillars” which focus on social pressure on business, the characteristics of a number of different business models and on the emerging role of government ( |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.