Table 1

Identified criteria and sub-criteria based on the TOE framework

DimensionCriteriaDefinitionSub-criteriaSource
TechnologyBattery Performance (F1)Refers to energy density, charging speed, cycle life, and thermal stability essential for Indian traffic and climate conditionsEnergy density (SF11): It is used to estimate the power stored per unit weight and is essential for the critical range for the EVsKhan et al. (2023), Cellura et al. (2025) 
Cycle life (SF12): Estimated by the number of charge-discharge cycles a battery can sustainCellura et al. (2025) 
Fast-charging capability (SF13): This ensures that the battery manufacturer must consider the technology which enables quick charging capabilities for EVsZhang et al. (2024), Chen et al. (2025) 
Thermal stability (SF14): This ensures that the battery manufacturer must produce the battery to sustain extreme weather events during summer and winter for effective use of EVsHarasis et al. (2025), Cellura et al. (2025) 
Innovation in Technology (F2)This criterion demonstrates the supplier's ability to adopt or develop next-generation battery technologies over a period of timeR&D capability (SF21): It facilitates the organisations to innovate and get a competitive advantageSang et al. (2024) 
Tech upgrades (SF22): Are suppliers continuously adopting the advanced chemistries (e.g., lithium iron phosphate, nickel manganese cobalt)Mohseni et al. (2023) 
Compatibility (F3)Refers to ease of integration with vehicle architecture, such as for 2/3/4 wheelers and swap abilityEV model fit (SF31): Ease of integrating the battery into 2W/3W/4W EV chassis architectureKumar and Singh (2024) 
Swap ability (SF32): Sustainability for easy battery swapping modelsAdu-Gyamfi et al. (2024) 
Safety and Reliability (F4)Provides a guarantee of fault tolerance, fire resistance, and durability over India's road and temperature conditionsDefect rate (FS41): Historical failure rate under stressTusnial et al. (2020) 
Safety certifications (SF42): Compliance with ISO/BIS battery safety normsLin et al. (2023), Cellura et al. (2025) 
End-of-life (EOL) Management or Recyclability (F5)Supplier's provision for battery recycling or reuse to reduce environmental impactEOL management (SF51): Do suppliers plan for take-back, reuse and recycling?Chayutthanabun et al. (2025) 
Circularity efforts (SF52): Design for disassembly or secondary usePicatoste et al. (2022), El Jalbout and Keivanpour (2023) 
OrganisationFinancial Stability (F6)Reflects a supplier's capacity to withstand market shocks, sustain operations, and invest in sustainable innovationsCreditworthiness (SF61): Suppliers must ensure that they are able to ramp up or reduce their production under dynamic demands so as to meet the supply and demand effectivelyParviziomran and Elliot (2024) 
Debt-to-equity ratio (SF62): Suppliers must have a safer debt-to-equity ratio to safeguard their working capital independence during order fulfilmentGinn and Saadaoui (2025) 
Liquidity ratio (SF63): This factor ensures battery suppliers have sufficient capital under any uncertain circumstances and can meet short term liabilitiesPenttinen et al. (2011) 
Production Capacity (F7)The ability to fulfill bulk orders and scale with rising EV demandScalability (SF71): Flexibility to increase output as demand growsDehkordi et al. (2024) 
Advanced production (SF72): Use of Industry 4.0 tools for efficient productionGirke et al. (2025) 
Supply Chain Reliability (F8)Evaluates consistency in on-time delivery, order fulfillment accuracy, and responsiveness to disruptions, which is critical for maintaining lean EVs production schedulesOn-time delivery performance (SF81): Battery suppliers must ensure that they will adhere to fulfill order delivery on time during any dynamic circumstancesJagani et al. (2024) 
Crisis responsiveness (SF82): If there is any scarcity of mineral resources during supply chain disruptions, suppliers must adhere to agility and recovery for minimal disruption for continuous EV productionDehghani Sadrabadi et al. (2024) 
Order fulfillment (SF83): Consistency in delivering the correct quantity and quality of batteriesDhairiyasamy et al. (2024) 
Collaboration Willingness (F9)The supplier's readiness to partner in R&D, customisation and technology sharingCo-development (SF91): Rapid innovation, customised solutions, and technology sharing are made possible by co-development with battery suppliers to ensure that products satisfy changing consumer and industry demandsSumrit (2020), Zhao et al. (2025) 
EnvironmentRegulatory pressure (F10)Degree to which suppliers are influenced by environmental laws, safety standards, and government mandates related to EV batteriesEnvironment compliance (SF101): Adherence to emission, e-waste, and recycling regulationsTusnial et al. (2020) 
Battery policy adherence (SF102): Alignment with national battery waste management and safety guidelinesHabiburrahman et al. (2025) 
Market Dynamics (F11)External forces in the EV and battery market that impact a supplier's competitiveness and innovationCompetitive intensity (SF111): Number of active competitors pushing for innovationHabiburrahman et al. (2025) 
Market volatility (SF112): Sensitivity to global price and demand changes for battery componentsCheng et al. (2024) 
Global Supply Risk and Resilience (F12)Help assess the supplier's exposure to geopolitical risk and material availability and ensure that sourcing reliability and resilience for the raw materialGeopolitical exposure (SF121): Dependence on battery metals from regions having disruptionsLou et al. (2025) 
Logistics disruption sensitivity (SF122): Vulnerability to international shipping delays and trade restrictionsRen et al. (2024) 
Source(s): Created by authors

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal