The life-cycle stage of ID-TPA projects
| Dependent variable: NPOP | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | |
| Using sample averages | Control for accumulated prior expenditures | Control for project ages | |
| logTPA_EXP | 0.8092*** | 1.2401*** | 1.5638*** |
| (3.09) | (5.70) | (5.36) | |
| SOE*logTPA_EXP | −0.3612* | −0.6644*** | −0.6428*** |
| (−1.95) | (−4.21) | (−4.15) | |
| PC*logTPA_EXP | −0.1176 | −0.2005 | −0.2114 |
| (−0.59) | (−0.95) | (−1.01) | |
| POVERTY*logTPA_EXP | −0.3498 | −0.4124*** | −0.3728** |
| (−1.59) | (−2.59) | (−2.34) | |
| DECENTRAL*logTPA_EXP | 0.2780** | 0.2197*** | 0.2310*** |
| (2.37) | (2.89) | (3.04) | |
| ADV*logTPA_EXP | 0.5335 | 0.2681 | 0.4241 |
| (0.44) | (0.25) | (0.40) | |
| COVER*logTPA_EXP | −0.0111 | −0.1022 | −0.1017 |
| (−0.13) | (−1.30) | (−1.29) | |
| MAND_CSR*logTPA_EXP | 0.3895* | 0.3580** | 0.3711** |
| (1.90) | (2.16) | (2.25) | |
| ADJ_ROA*logTPA_EXP | 6.9142*** | 7.6459*** | 7.2468*** |
| (3.45) | (4.20) | (3.96) | |
| logAPEXP | 0.1805 | ||
| (1.20) | |||
| logAPEXP*logTPA_EXP | −0.0175 | ||
| (−0.85) | |||
| Age | 1.8050* | ||
| (1.76) | |||
| Age*logTPA_EXP | −0.3659* | ||
| (−1.80) | |||
| IMR | 1.1683 | 2.6203** | 2.8840*** |
| (1.20) | (2.41) | (2.79) | |
| Constant | −7.9825*** | −13.0120*** | −14.9763*** |
| (−3.22) | (−5.18) | (−5.61) | |
| Control variables | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Industry dummies | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Year dummies | No | Yes | Yes |
| Pseudo R2 | 0.0896 | 0.0719 | 0.0726 |
| N | 479 | 881 | 881 |
| Dependent variable: | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | |
| Using sample averages | Control for accumulated prior expenditures | Control for project ages | |
| 0.8092*** | 1.2401*** | 1.5638*** | |
| (3.09) | (5.70) | (5.36) | |
| −0.3612* | −0.6644*** | −0.6428*** | |
| (−1.95) | (−4.21) | (−4.15) | |
| −0.1176 | −0.2005 | −0.2114 | |
| (−0.59) | (−0.95) | (−1.01) | |
| −0.3498 | −0.4124*** | −0.3728** | |
| (−1.59) | (−2.59) | (−2.34) | |
| 0.2780** | 0.2197*** | 0.2310*** | |
| (2.37) | (2.89) | (3.04) | |
| 0.5335 | 0.2681 | 0.4241 | |
| (0.44) | (0.25) | (0.40) | |
| −0.0111 | −0.1022 | −0.1017 | |
| (−0.13) | (−1.30) | (−1.29) | |
| 0.3895* | 0.3580** | 0.3711** | |
| (1.90) | (2.16) | (2.25) | |
| 6.9142*** | 7.6459*** | 7.2468*** | |
| (3.45) | (4.20) | (3.96) | |
| 0.1805 | |||
| (1.20) | |||
| −0.0175 | |||
| (−0.85) | |||
| 1.8050* | |||
| (1.76) | |||
| −0.3659* | |||
| (−1.80) | |||
| 1.1683 | 2.6203** | 2.8840*** | |
| (1.20) | (2.41) | (2.79) | |
| −7.9825*** | −13.0120*** | −14.9763*** | |
| (−3.22) | (−5.18) | (−5.61) | |
| Control variables | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Industry dummies | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Year dummies | No | Yes | Yes |
| Pseudo | 0.0896 | 0.0719 | 0.0726 |
| 479 | 881 | 881 | |
Note(s): This table presents the second-stage estimation results of the two-stage Heckman selection model (Eq. (2)) after controlling for the life-cycle stage of ID-TPA projects. The dependent variable is NPOP, the number of people lifted out of poverty by a company in the current year. Column (1) controls for the life-cycle stage of ID-TPA projects by using the by-firm sample average of each variable in the regression; column (2) controls for the life-cycle stage of ID-TPA projects by adding logAPEXP (the natural log of accumulated past ID-TPA expenditures) and its interaction with logTPA_EXP (the natural log of current year expenditures on ID-TPA projects); column (3) controls for the life-cycle stage of ID-TPA projects by adding Age (the age of ID-TPA projects) and its interaction with logTPA_EXP. Numbers reported in parentheses are t-statistics. ***/**/*: significant at the 1%/5%/10% level (two-tailed), respectively. Please refer to Appendix 2 for definitions of the remaining variables
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.