Table 10

Analyst sophistication

(1)(2)(3)
VariablesCAR [−1, +1]CAR [−1, +1]CAR [−1, +1]
LT (%)−0.001410.000362−0.00328
(−0.31)(0.08)(−0.70)
TP∆/P−0.002170.005560.00221
(−0.55)(1.41)(0.64)
High Experience0.0132***  
(10.67)  
Large Broker 0.00213* 
 (1.74) 
High Past Accuracy  0.00491***
  (4.26)
LT (%)×TP∆/P0.0270*0.0296**0.0447***
(1.70)(2.07)(3.27)
High Experience × LT (%)−0.0107**  
(−2.38)  
High Experience × TP∆/P0.00774  
(1.43)  
High Experience × LT (%) × TP∆/P0.0598**  
(2.30)  
Large Broker × LT (%) −0.0119*** 
 (−2.76) 
Large Broker × TP∆/P −0.0174*** 
 (−3.04) 
Large Broker × LT (%) × TP∆/P 0.102*** 
 (3.66) 
High Past Accuracy × LT (%)  −0.00380
  (−0.92)
High Past Accuracy × TP∆/P  −0.0127
  (−1.42)
High Past Accuracy × LT(%) × TP∆/P  0.0753**
  (2.45)
N53,98853,98846,814
Adj. R20.1490.1370.137
Firm & Year FEsYesYesYes
ControlsYesYesYes

Note(s): This table estimates the effect of long-term institutional shareholdings (LT (%)) on the stock market response (CARs) to target price revisions (TP∆/P) after considering the role of analyst sophistication. All the variables are defined in table A1 in Appendix. The t-statistics are reported in parentheses. Standard errors are clustered at the firm level. *, ** and *** denote statistical significance for the coefficients at 10%, 5% and 1% respectively

Source(s): Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal