The summary of machine learning algorithms for predicting cheating from exam results
| Approach | Algorithms/models | Data used | Key strengths | Performance highlights |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exam score anomaly detection | RNN + Outlier Detection | Sequential exam scores | Captures temporal patterns, unsupervised | TPR∼95%, FPR∼5% |
| Binary classification | GLM, LR, DT, RF | Demographics + psychological features | Interpretable, uses fraud theory factors | Precision 50–75% for cheating class |
| Deep learning temporal models | DNN, LSTM, DenseLSTM, RNN | Exam score sequences | High accuracy on complex patterns | Up to 95% accuracy |
| Exam score anomaly detection | RNN + Outlier Detection | Sequential exam scores | Captures temporal patterns, unsupervised | TPR∼95%, FPR∼5% |
| Video behavior detection | Improved YOLOv8 + Attention mechanism | Exam room video footage | Real-time detection of cheating actions | ∼82.7% accuracy |
| Approach | Algorithms/models | Data used | Key strengths | Performance highlights |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exam score anomaly detection | RNN + Outlier Detection | Sequential exam scores | Captures temporal patterns, unsupervised | TPR∼95%, FPR∼5% |
| Binary classification | GLM, LR, DT, RF | Demographics + psychological features | Interpretable, uses fraud theory factors | Precision 50–75% for cheating class |
| Deep learning temporal models | DNN, LSTM, DenseLSTM, RNN | Exam score sequences | High accuracy on complex patterns | Up to 95% accuracy |
| Exam score anomaly detection | RNN + Outlier Detection | Sequential exam scores | Captures temporal patterns, unsupervised | TPR∼95%, FPR∼5% |
| Video behavior detection | Improved YOLOv8 + Attention mechanism | Exam room video footage | Real-time detection of cheating actions | ∼82.7% accuracy |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.