Table 2.

List of case tests along with their corresponding validity and reliability instruments

Test caseInstrument/actionInstrument/action detailsCode
Content validityAsk experts for support…to revise the questions in the interview scriptCV1A
…on methodological issuesCV1B
…when attending conferencesCV1C
…to review the work’s literatureCV1D
…to evaluate the study’s comparable resultsCV1E
…to review the study’s findingsCV1F
…academia and the marketCV1G
…to define the case selection criteriaCV1H
…to obtain technical information in the context of analysisCV1I
…during the exploratory phase of the studyCV1J
…to evaluate emerging concepts and themesCV1J
Carry out a pilot test…to refine the interview scriptCV1L
…to refine the questionnaireCV1M
…to check the integrity of the frameworkCV1N
Send a copy of the interview script to the interviewees in advanceCV2
Create a diagram or illustration of the structure to help explain it during data collectionCV3
Perform face validityCV4
Adjust/improve the interview script during the data collection processCV5
Research previous works in the literature related to the topic (they support the literature)CV6
Conduct postsurvey discussionCV7
In focus groups, ensure everyone’s participationCV8
In focus groups, verbal and nonverbal attention shifts from dominant participantsCV9
Prepare the script in such a way as to avoid unnecessary ambiguityCV10
Prepare the script in such a way as to avoid discrediting any intervieweeCV11
Use the researcher’s independence and neutrality to create an informal interview situationCV12
Construct validityPerform triangulationDataCOV1A
ResearchersCOV1B
MethodologicalCOV1C
TheoreticalCOV1D
Include multiple sources of evidenceCOV2
Have key informants review the draft…the study participants themselvesCOV3A
…being expertsCOV3B
Establish a chain of evidenceCOV4
Identify units of analysis and acquire data to measure themCOV5
Elaborate the conceptual framework based on the literature and the experience of the researchersCOV6
Perform factorial analysisCOV7
Define the concept, case and context under studyCOV8
Ensure congruence between research question and methodCOV9
Use theory to develop constructsCOV10
Define your theoretical concepts explicitly from the initial design of the research and “maintain a uniform definition throughout the research process”COV11
Draw up a well-written interview scriptCOV12
The interviewer has previous experience in conducting surveysCOV13
Use an expert interviewCOV14
Check the transcript of the interviews and compare them with the recordingsCOV15
External validitySeeking analytical generalizationEV1
Using multiple casesEV2
Use replication logicLiteralEV3A
TheoreticalEV3B
Use theory in single case studiesEV4
Perform analysis between casesEV5
Select more than one group of participants…to ensure a cross-section of opinionsEV6A
…and collect data over different periods of timeEV6B
…to limit elite biasEV6C
Carry out theoretical samplingEV7
Internal validityPerform pattern matchingIV1
Interview only key informantsIV2
Building causal evidenceIV3
Building explanationsIV4
Examining alternative propositions (rival explanation)IV5
Purposely select the sampleIV6
Building logical modelsIV7
Matching theory and fieldIV8
Peer debriefingIV9
Carry out action research as part of a case studyIV10
Search for patternsIV11
Create diagrams to ensure internal consistency of the data collectedIV12
Carry out inter-rater reliability testingIV13
Asking respondents to explain their answers to the Likert scale questionsIV14
Perform hierarchical interpretation and explanation of the inductive logical relationship by the research frameworkIV15
Record alternative explanationsIV16
Record the sampling criteria in the study protocolIV17
Use cognitive mapping to convey causal connectionsIV18
Use regression modeling to converge sources of evidenceIV19
Conduct discriminant validityIV20
Perform member checkingIV21
ReliabilityRecord the interviewsRE1
Create a structured research protocolRE2
Carry out an iterative process between data, concepts and codingRE3
Transcribe all interviews verbatimRE4
Create a case study databaseRE5
Avoid sectarian views (interpretation bias)RE6
Create a field diary during data collection (field notes)RE7
Carry out independent coding of the dataRE8
Recode or combine categoriesRE9
Provide a detailed description of the data collection and analysis processesRE10
Look for significant parallels in the findings of the multiple data sourcesRE11
Confirm the coding of the data among the authors (coding process)RE12
Create an interview script with open-ended questionsRE13
Carry out a detailed description of the research contextRE14
Carry out in-depth data collectionRE15
Conduct an audit trail to record changes and limitationsRE16
Return to the field more than once. Collect data more than once (for nonlongitudinal studies)RE17
Conduct a systematic interpretation of the data or field notesRE18
Perform intercoder agreement (member check)RE19
Make notes for cases where recording was not authorizedRE20
Perform intercoder reliabilityRE21
Keep the results consistent with realityRE22
Perform Cronbach’s alpha testRE23
Carry out the data collection process under similar circumstances for all interviewsRE24
Carry out complementary questioning to obtain a complete view of a given subjectRE25
Make a conscious effort to keep the researcher’s interpretations separate from the coding processRE26
Conduct an automated content analysis, seeking to remove subjective interpretationsRE27
Perform composite reliabilityRE28
Perform indicator reliabilityRE29
Make the data available to external reviewersRE30
Explain the intention of the study to the interviewee in advanceRE31
Clearly state the position of the researchers about the situation under investigationRE32
Make the author of the study available to provide additional information on the selected casesRE33
Omit variables that do not meet the theoretical criteriaRE34
Organize both primary and secondary data in an Excel spreadsheetRE35
Standardize the description of the casesRE36
Standardize field notesRE37
Carry out a “confirmability audit”RE38
Carry out a systematic thematic analysisRE39
Source(s): Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal

Gift article access

As a benefit of your subscription, you can share temporary access to restricted articles.

Each link will stop working after 30 days or 10 uses. You may create up to 10 links in a 30 day period.

Please sign in to your personal account to gift article access.

Register

Gift article access

As a benefit of your subscription, you can share temporary access to restricted articles.

Each link will stop working after 30 days or 10 uses. You may create up to 10 links in a 30 day period.

Gift articles remaining: --

Gift article access

Each link will stop working after 30 days or 10 uses. You may create up to 10 links in a 30 day period.

Gift articles remaining: --

Gift article access

As a benefit of your subscription, you can share temporary access to restricted articles.

Each link will stop working after 30 days or 10 uses.

You have reached the limit of 10 links within a 30 day period.