Table 2 Fornell–Larcker criterion 1 2 3...

Table 2

Fornell–Larcker criterion

	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9
1 ESWB	0.822
2 STV	0.414	0.766
3 IWA	0.389	0.530	0.731
4 SPM	0.408	0.250	0.312	0.842
5 Age	−0.070	0.022	−0.120	−0.182	1
6 Gender	−0.040	0.054	−0.011	−0.060	−0.144	1
7 Tenure	0.042	0.023	−0.060	−0.069	0.330	−0.176	1
8 Education level	−0.098	−0.005	−0.011	−0.090	0.032	−0.035	−0.018	1
9 Firm size	−0.081	−0.018	−0.005	−0.012	0.034	−0.14	0.064	0.084	1

	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9
1 ESWB	0.822
2 STV	0.414	0.766
3 IWA	0.389	0.530	0.731
4 SPM	0.408	0.250	0.312	0.842
5 Age	−0.070	0.022	−0.120	−0.182	1
6 Gender	−0.040	0.054	−0.011	−0.060	−0.144	1
7 Tenure	0.042	0.023	−0.060	−0.069	0.330	−0.176	1
8 Education level	−0.098	−0.005	−0.011	−0.090	0.032	−0.035	−0.018	1
9 Firm size	−0.081	−0.018	−0.005	−0.012	0.034	−0.14	0.064	0.084	1

Note(s): ESWB: Environmentally sustainable work behavior, STV: Self-transcendence values, IWA: Innovative work attitudes, SPM: Sustainable performance management. Italic diagonal items represent the square root value of AVEs; others are latent variable correlations. Significant level: ^***: p < 0.001, ^**: p < 0.01, ^*: p < 0.05, ^†: p < 0.10

Source(s): Authors' own work

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable