Table 1 Comparison of optimization...

Table 1

Comparison of optimization results for different specified values of average uniformity parameter (⁠ $\bar{U p}$ ⁠)

		T_sus (K)		V_in (m/s)		Log (D) (kg/m²-s)			% error
Sl. no	Log (⁠ $\bar{Up})$	CRSM	ML	CRSM	ML	CFD	CRSM	ML	CRSM	ML
1	−4.4	1,183.6	1,208.9	0.907	0.903	0.000181	0.000187	0.000186	3.31	3.00
2	−4.35	1,039.2	1,078.1	0.903	0.899	0.000188	0.000192	0.000190	2.60	1.46
3	−4.28	886.14	935.58	0.898	0.893	0.000197	0.000200	0.000196	1.92	−0.13
4	−4.25	832.72	884.69	0.897	0.891	0.000200	0.000204	0.000199	1.69	−0.68
5	−4.18	727.61	783.29	0.893	0.886	0.000209	0.000212	0.000206	1.33	−1.66
6	−4.15	689.29	746.19	0.892	0.884	0.000213	0.000215	0.000208	1.26	−2.02
7	−4.08	611.79	669.84	0.888	0.88	0.000221	0.000224	0.000215	1.12	−2.63
8	−4.05	582.91	641.01	0.887	0.878	0.000225	0.000227	0.000218	1.15	−2.84
9	−4.03	564.81	622.91	0.886	0.877	0.000227	0.000230	0.000220	1.14	−2.96

		T_sus (K)		V_in (m/s)		Log (D) (kg/m²-s)			% error
Sl. no	Log ( $\bar{Up})$	CRSM	ML	CRSM	ML	CFD	CRSM	ML	CRSM	ML
1	−4.4	1,183.6	1,208.9	0.907	0.903	0.000181	0.000187	0.000186	3.31	3.00
2	−4.35	1,039.2	1,078.1	0.903	0.899	0.000188	0.000192	0.000190	2.60	1.46
3	−4.28	886.14	935.58	0.898	0.893	0.000197	0.000200	0.000196	1.92	−0.13
4	−4.25	832.72	884.69	0.897	0.891	0.000200	0.000204	0.000199	1.69	−0.68
5	−4.18	727.61	783.29	0.893	0.886	0.000209	0.000212	0.000206	1.33	−1.66
6	−4.15	689.29	746.19	0.892	0.884	0.000213	0.000215	0.000208	1.26	−2.02
7	−4.08	611.79	669.84	0.888	0.88	0.000221	0.000224	0.000215	1.12	−2.63
8	−4.05	582.91	641.01	0.887	0.878	0.000225	0.000227	0.000218	1.15	−2.84
9	−4.03	564.81	622.91	0.886	0.877	0.000227	0.000230	0.000220	1.14	−2.96