Table 2 Comparison of optimization...

Table 2

Comparison of optimization results for different specified values of average deposition rate (⁠ $\bar{D}$ ⁠)

		T_sus (K)		V_in (m/s)		Log (D) (kg/m²-s)			% error
Sl. no	Log (⁠ $\bar{D})$	CRSM	ML	CRSM	ML	CFD	CRSM	ML	CRSM	ML
1	−3.58	400	400	0.895	0.876	−3.7717	−3.7735	−3.7998	0.047	0.745
2	−3.63	536	525	0.885	0.87	−3.9385	−3.9961	−3.9530	1.462	0.368
3	−3.68	769	745	0.895	0.885	−4.1043	−4.2099	−4.1494	2.572	1.098
4	−3.73	1,215	1224	0.901	0.904	−4.3770	−4.4094	−4.4051	0.740	0.641
5	−3.8	1,500	1500	0.660	0.629	−4.6353	−4.5102	−4.5119	−2.698	−2.662
6	−3.85	1,500	1500	0.540	0.515	−4.7189	−4.5174	−4.5169	−4.270	−4.280
7	−3.9	1,500	1500	0.457	0.455	−4.6139	−4.5188	−4.5175	−2.061	−2.089
8	−3.95	1,500	1500	0.457	0.455	−4.6152	−4.5188	−4.5175	−2.088	−2.116

		T_sus (K)		V_in (m/s)		Log (D) (kg/m²-s)			% error
Sl. no	Log ( $\bar{D})$	CRSM	ML	CRSM	ML	CFD	CRSM	ML	CRSM	ML
1	−3.58	400	400	0.895	0.876	−3.7717	−3.7735	−3.7998	0.047	0.745
2	−3.63	536	525	0.885	0.87	−3.9385	−3.9961	−3.9530	1.462	0.368
3	−3.68	769	745	0.895	0.885	−4.1043	−4.2099	−4.1494	2.572	1.098
4	−3.73	1,215	1224	0.901	0.904	−4.3770	−4.4094	−4.4051	0.740	0.641
5	−3.8	1,500	1500	0.660	0.629	−4.6353	−4.5102	−4.5119	−2.698	−2.662
6	−3.85	1,500	1500	0.540	0.515	−4.7189	−4.5174	−4.5169	−4.270	−4.280
7	−3.9	1,500	1500	0.457	0.455	−4.6139	−4.5188	−4.5175	−2.061	−2.089
8	−3.95	1,500	1500	0.457	0.455	−4.6152	−4.5188	−4.5175	−2.088	−2.116