Leadership as a philosophical attitude
| Leadership styles | Leadership and personal development | Leadership motivation and social responsibility | Leadership and the social mission |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moral-oriented leadership | Strengths | Strengths | Strengths |
| Supports personal growth through compliance to ethical guidelines and moral integrity | Motivates employees by being a role model and showing social responsibility | Promotes societal progress and contribution to change through moral guidance | |
| Weaknesses | Weaknesses | Weaknesses | |
| Employees’ who prioritise own profit might not value a moral-oriented leader’s focus | A moral-oriented leader might struggle to motivate employees with different norms and practices | A moral-oriented leader might struggle balancing diverse and conflicting interests, especially when ethical principles clash with the social mission | |
| Contingency approaches | Strengths | Strengths | Strengths |
| Encourages personal development by embracing and integrating individual skills and fostering a sense of ownership | Motivates by recognising and valuing individual differences and fostering an inclusive environment with active engagement | Advances societal progress by promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion | |
| Weaknesses | Weaknesses | Weaknesses | |
| Laissez-faire leadership often hinders personal development due to lack of direction and feedback | Laissez-faire leadership may lead to low motivation and social responsibility as employees may feel neglected and unsupported | Laissez-faire leadership can negatively impact the social mission due to lack of organisational direction and leadership |
| Leadership styles | Leadership and personal development | Leadership motivation and social responsibility | Leadership and the social mission |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moral-oriented leadership | Strengths | Strengths | Strengths |
| Supports personal growth through compliance to ethical guidelines and moral integrity | Motivates employees by being a role model and showing social responsibility | Promotes societal progress and contribution to change through moral guidance | |
| Weaknesses | Weaknesses | Weaknesses | |
| Employees’ who prioritise own profit might not value a moral-oriented leader’s focus | A moral-oriented leader might struggle to motivate employees with different norms and practices | A moral-oriented leader might struggle balancing diverse and conflicting interests, especially when ethical principles clash with the social mission | |
| Contingency approaches | Strengths | Strengths | Strengths |
| Encourages personal development by embracing and integrating individual skills and fostering a sense of ownership | Motivates by recognising and valuing individual differences and fostering an inclusive environment with active engagement | Advances societal progress by promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion | |
| Weaknesses | Weaknesses | Weaknesses | |
| Laissez-faire leadership often hinders personal development due to lack of direction and feedback | Laissez-faire leadership may lead to low motivation and social responsibility as employees may feel neglected and unsupported | Laissez-faire leadership can negatively impact the social mission due to lack of organisational direction and leadership |
Source(s): Author’s own work
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.