Importance of jeopardizing a good relationship with the contracting authority and with other companies
| Order of importance | Respondents |
|---|---|
| Panel A: Risk of jeopardizing a good relationship with the contracting authority | |
| 1 | 85 |
| 2 | 21 |
| 3 | 10 |
| 4 | 10 |
| 5 | 2 |
| 6 | 1 |
| Panel B: Risk of jeopardizing a good relationship with partners/other companies | |
| 1 | 27 |
| 2 | 37 |
| 3 | 19 |
| 4 | 12 |
| 5 | 6 |
| Order of importance | Respondents |
|---|---|
| 1 | 85 |
| 2 | 21 |
| 3 | 10 |
| 4 | 10 |
| 5 | 2 |
| 6 | 1 |
| 1 | 27 |
| 2 | 37 |
| 3 | 19 |
| 4 | 12 |
| 5 | 6 |
Note(s): Panel A: Six respondents answered that jeopardizing the business relationship with the contracting authority influenced the decision, but did not indicate the order of importance. Panel B: Six respondents answered that jeopardizing the business relationship with partners/other companies influenced the decision, but did not indicate the order of importance
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.