Table 1.

Summary of previously assessed ESG activities applied in this study

(E) Environmental activitiesSources
(E1) Energy saving InitiativesSchulze et al. (2016) 
(E2) Water saving Initiatives.Christ and Burritt (2017) 
(E3) Measuring carbon footprintToka et al. (2015) 
(E4) Recycling of raw materialsSilva et al. (2017) 
(E5) Recyclable packagingKlaiman et al. (2016) 
(E6) ECO friendly logisticsGovindan and Soleimani (2017); Leonidou et al. (2016) 
(S) Social activities
(S1) Paying taxesBaudet et al. (2020)
(S2) Fair wagesLarkin et al. (2012); Vaughan-Whitehead (2010) 
(S3) Profit-sharingHuddart and Liang (2005) 
(S4) Charitable givingGodfrey (2005) 
(S5) Child laborKolk and van Tulder (2002) 
(S6) Collaboration with UnionsFjeldstad et al., 2012; Meiers (2014) 
(S7) Supplier Codes of ConductShort et al. (2016) 
(S8) Employee Health and Safety PolicyNordlöf et al. (2017) 
(S9) Diversity and equal opportunitiesLawrence and Turner (2016); Nielsen and Nielsen (2013) 
(G) Governance activities
(G1) Board-level CSR/ESG programsIoannou and Serafeim (2015) 
(G2) Executive compensation approved by AGMChng et al. (2012) 
(G3) Independent board membersDesender et al. (2013); Kroll et al. (2008) 
(G4) Female board membersBear et al. (2010) 
(G5) ESG/CSR policyCheng et al. (2014); Wang and Bansal (2012) 
(G6) Cybersecurity managementBone (2016); Tisdale (2015) 
(G7) Anti-corruption policyYang (2009) 
Note(s):

See  Appendix for full description. These activities are empirically confirmed as relevant/important to institutional investors

Source(s): Table by authors

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal