Table 3 Testing the hypotheses... | Emerald Publishing

Table 3

Testing the hypotheses

Relationship	H	β (Stand. Error)	R²
Perseverance → Leadership	H1	0.37*** (0.212)	0.53
Passion for Work → Leadership	H2	0.41*** (0.160)
Women Owner Age → Leadership		−0.11 (−0.017)
Women Owner Work Experience → Leadership		0.13* (0.147)
Leadership → Robustness	H3a	0.48***(0.108)	0.23
Leadership → Agility	H3b	0.24*** (0.096)	0.06
Leadership → Integrity	H3c	0.18** (0.086)	0.03
Robustness → Performance	H4a	0.21** (0.099)	0.13
Agility → Performance	H4b	0.19** (0.118)
Integrity → Performance	H4c	−0.10 (0.132)
Firm Age → Performance		−0.01 (−0.059)
Firm Size → Performance		0.20** (0.159)
Structural Model Fit: χ² = 255.731; df = 169; χ²/df = 1.51; RMSEA = 0.076; NNFI = 0.893; CFI = 0.914; SRMR = 0.048

Relationship	H	β (Stand. Error)	R²
Perseverance → Leadership	H1	0.37*** (0.212)	0.53
Passion for Work → Leadership	H2	0.41*** (0.160)
Women Owner Age → Leadership		−0.11 (−0.017)
Women Owner Work Experience → Leadership		0.13* (0.147)
Leadership → Robustness	H3a	0.48***(0.108)	0.23
Leadership → Agility	H3b	0.24*** (0.096)	0.06
Leadership → Integrity	H3c	0.18** (0.086)	0.03
Robustness → Performance	H4a	0.21** (0.099)	0.13
Agility → Performance	H4b	0.19** (0.118)
Integrity → Performance	H4c	−0.10 (0.132)
Firm Age → Performance		−0.01 (−0.059)
Firm Size → Performance		0.20** (0.159)
Structural Model Fit: χ² = 255.731; df = 169; χ²/df = 1.51; RMSEA = 0.076; NNFI = 0.893; CFI = 0.914; SRMR = 0.048

Note(s): * - p < 0.10 ** - p < 0.05 *** - p < 0.001; p-values are based on z-values from a one-tailed test; β - Completely standardised coefficients

Source(s): Authors’ own work