Table 2

Descriptive statistics and two-sample mean comparison test between Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan sub-samples

VariablesFull sample (N = 511)Uzbekistan (N = 256)Kazakhstan (N = 255)Diff
MeanSDMinMaxMeanSDMeanSD
SFA production function
Age of the respondents (years)45.3711.86217943.5110.1747.2313.10−3.71***
Education of the farmers (years)5.761.69186.021.585.501.760.52***
Cotton area in hectares (ha)15.8714.65110020.6415.1411.0812.459.55***
Female labour (number)0.773.460500.241.421.304.64−1.06***
Total labour (number)6.579.0311506.813.516.3312.300.47
Nitrogen fertiliser costs/ha (USD)84.80104.790976.34105.17134.4264.3455.4240.82***
Phosphorus costs/ha (USD)26.9137.380367.3144.3236.879.4228.7834.89***
Potassium costs/ha (USD)3.5711.220138.374.938.602.1913.232.73**
Total NPK costs/ha (USD)a115.28113.111.02976.34154.43134.6775.9766.2378.45***
Machinery costs/ha (USD)191.70363.730.042702.7071.8570.33312.01481.32−240.16***
Oil costs/ha (USD)47.5136.071.37405.4050.3419.3344.6847.125.66*
Cotton revenue/ha (USD)975.39388.8621.874,000925.86295.931025.13459.06−99.25**
Inefficiency model
Farm distance from dwelling (km)5.765.800405.486.236.045.32−0.56
Simpson diversity index0.320.2200.660.460.080.180.220.28***
Soil quality (fertile = 1; otherwise = 0)0.480.44010.570.410.390.450.18***
Agronomic information received from farmers' union (yes = 1; no = 0)0.490.50010.720.440.250.430.47***
Farm location to water source head (close = 1; otherwise = 0)0.240.42010.240.430.230.420.006
Farmer used cotton combine (yes = 1; no = 0)0.270.4401n.a.n.a.0.540.49n.a.

Note(s): The level of significance is ***p < 0.01, **p < 0.05, *p < 0.1

aAggregate costs of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilisers

Source(s): Table created by authors

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options