SFA estimates of the translog production variables
| Frontier | Coef. TLi | Coef. TL | Coef. CDi | Coef. CD | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ln cotton area | −0.174 | (0.224) | −0.1889 | (0.214) | −0.016 | (0.017) | −0.007 | (0.018) |
| Ln labours | 0.030 | (0.208) | 0.102 | (0.190) | −0.059** | (0.024) | −0.063*** | (0.023) |
| Ln oil costs/ha | −0.221 | (0.170) | −0.302* | (0.163) | 0.058*** | (0.021) | 0.047** | (0.021) |
| Ln machine costs/ha | 0.096 | (0.111) | 0.124 | (0.105) | −0.023* | (0.013) | −0.022* | (0.013) |
| Ln fertiliser costs NPK/ha | 0.374*** | (0.147) | 0.499*** | (0.147) | 0.120*** | (0.029) | 0.137*** | (0.029) |
| Soil quality (fertility) | 0.077** | (0.036) | 0.117*** | (0.037) | 0.088** | (0.037) | 0.126*** | (0.037) |
| Country dummy | 0.336*** | (0.056) | 0.268*** | (0.052) | 0.351*** | (0.048) | 0.264*** | (0.044) |
| Ln area sq | 0.050* | (0.030) | 0.050 | (0.033) | ||||
| Ln labour sq | 0.015 | (0.046) | 0.010 | (0.043) | ||||
| Ln oil costs/ha sq | 0.074** | (0.035) | 0.066** | (0.034) | ||||
| Ln machine costs/ha sq | 0.001 | (0.007) | −0.004 | (0.007) | ||||
| Ln fertiliser costs NPK/ha sq | −0.076** | (0.034) | −0.100*** | (0.034) | ||||
| Ln area*lab | 0.000 | (0.026) | −0.001 | (0.026) | ||||
| Ln area*oil | 0.048 | (0.033) | 0.060* | (0.032) | ||||
| Ln area*mach | −0.018 | (0.017) | −0.017 | (0.016) | ||||
| Ln area*ferti | −0.013 | (0.031) | −0.017 | (0.030) | ||||
| Ln lab*oil | −0.035 | (0.029) | −0.039 | (0.028) | ||||
| Ln lab*mach | 0.004 | (0.018) | 0.003 | (0.016) | ||||
| Ln lab*ferti | 0.001 | (0.041) | −0.009 | (0.039) | ||||
| Ln oil*mach | −0.031** | (0.015) | −0.026* | (0.014) | ||||
| Ln oil*ferti | 0.018 | (0.034) | 0.032 | (0.034) | ||||
| Ln mach*ferti | 0.008 | (0.021) | 0.001 | (0.020) | ||||
| Constant | 6.366*** | (0.543) | 6.127*** | (0.524) | 6.574*** | (0.154) | 6.534*** | (0.155) |
| N = 511 | ||||||||
| Wald (22) of TLi/TL | 133.11*** | 110.63*** | ||||||
| Wald (7) of CDi/CD | 93.16*** | 72.05*** | ||||||
| Log likelihood | −235.472 | −256.694 | −247.578 | −269.84 | ||||
| Gamma | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.80 | ||||
| Mean technical efficiency | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.64 | ||||
| Frontier | Coef. TLi | Coef. TL | Coef. CDi | Coef. CD | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ln cotton area | −0.174 | (0.224) | −0.1889 | (0.214) | −0.016 | (0.017) | −0.007 | (0.018) |
| Ln labours | 0.030 | (0.208) | 0.102 | (0.190) | −0.059** | (0.024) | −0.063*** | (0.023) |
| Ln oil costs/ha | −0.221 | (0.170) | −0.302* | (0.163) | 0.058*** | (0.021) | 0.047** | (0.021) |
| Ln machine costs/ha | 0.096 | (0.111) | 0.124 | (0.105) | −0.023* | (0.013) | −0.022* | (0.013) |
| Ln fertiliser costs NPK/ha | 0.374*** | (0.147) | 0.499*** | (0.147) | 0.120*** | (0.029) | 0.137*** | (0.029) |
| Soil quality (fertility) | 0.077** | (0.036) | 0.117*** | (0.037) | 0.088** | (0.037) | 0.126*** | (0.037) |
| Country dummy | 0.336*** | (0.056) | 0.268*** | (0.052) | 0.351*** | (0.048) | 0.264*** | (0.044) |
| Ln area sq | 0.050* | (0.030) | 0.050 | (0.033) | ||||
| Ln labour sq | 0.015 | (0.046) | 0.010 | (0.043) | ||||
| Ln oil costs/ha sq | 0.074** | (0.035) | 0.066** | (0.034) | ||||
| Ln machine costs/ha sq | 0.001 | (0.007) | −0.004 | (0.007) | ||||
| Ln fertiliser costs NPK/ha sq | −0.076** | (0.034) | −0.100*** | (0.034) | ||||
| Ln area*lab | 0.000 | (0.026) | −0.001 | (0.026) | ||||
| Ln area*oil | 0.048 | (0.033) | 0.060* | (0.032) | ||||
| Ln area*mach | −0.018 | (0.017) | −0.017 | (0.016) | ||||
| Ln area*ferti | −0.013 | (0.031) | −0.017 | (0.030) | ||||
| Ln lab*oil | −0.035 | (0.029) | −0.039 | (0.028) | ||||
| Ln lab*mach | 0.004 | (0.018) | 0.003 | (0.016) | ||||
| Ln lab*ferti | 0.001 | (0.041) | −0.009 | (0.039) | ||||
| Ln oil*mach | −0.031** | (0.015) | −0.026* | (0.014) | ||||
| Ln oil*ferti | 0.018 | (0.034) | 0.032 | (0.034) | ||||
| Ln mach*ferti | 0.008 | (0.021) | 0.001 | (0.020) | ||||
| Constant | 6.366*** | (0.543) | 6.127*** | (0.524) | 6.574*** | (0.154) | 6.534*** | (0.155) |
| Wald | 133.11*** | 110.63*** | ||||||
| Wald | 93.16*** | 72.05*** | ||||||
| Log likelihood | −235.472 | −256.694 | −247.578 | −269.84 | ||||
| Gamma | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.80 | ||||
| Mean technical efficiency | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.64 | ||||
Note(s): Translog (TL) TLi was preferred over Cobb-Douglas (CD) CDi. The TLi final model simultaneously estimates production and inefficiency variables; inefficiency estimates of TLi presented in Table 3. TL and CD are restricted models, without inefficiency variables. Standard errors are in parenthesis. The level of significance is ***p < 0.01, **p < 0.05, *p < 0.1
Source(s): Table created by authors
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.