Seven key issues that could help to achieve the admissibility of digital artifacts or traces as evidentiary material in cross-border trials considering four Latin American countries
| Category | Latin american countries | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MX | CH | CO | AR | |
| Crimes typification | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Digital media as evidentiary material | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Acceptance of digital forensic experts | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Laboratory accreditation | ✓ | × | ✓ | ✓ |
| Evidentiary material preservation and chain of custody | ✓ | × | ✓ | ✓ |
| Digital forensics methodologies | ✓ | × | × | ✓ |
| Membership in the Budapest Convention on Cybercrime | × | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Category | Latin american countries | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MX | CH | CO | AR | |
| Crimes typification | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Digital media as evidentiary material | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Acceptance of digital forensic experts | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Laboratory accreditation | ✓ | × | ✓ | ✓ |
| Evidentiary material preservation and chain of custody | ✓ | × | ✓ | ✓ |
| Digital forensics methodologies | ✓ | × | × | ✓ |
| Membership in the Budapest Convention on Cybercrime | × | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |