Coding scheme used for data analysis
| First-order themes | Second-order themes | Aggregate dimensions |
|---|---|---|
| Position in the recycling value chain | Actor network role | Connecting actors |
| Unique challenges | ||
| Specific responsibilities | Digital technology as a connector | |
| Identified different actors’ needs | Interest in DP | Informing actors |
| Actors’ expectations on DPs | ||
| Specific services used | Collection and delivery of data through the DP | |
| Importance of collaboration | Drivers and barriers connected to actors’ engagement | Mobilizing actors |
| Active involvement of citizens and business actors Notifications from citizens (in the form of pictures) about waste mismanagement and illegal dumping sites | ||
| Willingness to use digital technology (i.e. the DP-related app) | ||
| Key motivations for using the DP-related app | Actors’ engagement dynamics | |
| Timeline of interest in tech solutions | ||
| Notifications (in the form of pictures) from citizens about product characteristics | Data and knowledge sharing | Integrating data set and software |
| Waste consortia’s contribution in terms of product materials | ||
| Provision of data by municipalities and waste management companies | Brokerage process | |
| Integration of user knowledge | Co-implementation of MSW service delivery | Value co-production |
| Resources blended in co-production program | ||
| Process efficiency | Tangible benefits | Economic value |
| Revenue generation | ||
| Cost reduction | ||
| Awareness | Intangible benefits | Social value |
| Stewardship | ||
| Satisfaction | ||
| Loyalty | ||
| Social health risk reduction | ||
| Fewer resources used for alternative communication means | Tangible benefits | Environmental value |
| Less abandoned waste/littering | ||
| Higher recycling rate | ||
| Engaging citizens beyond service delivery | Citizens’ involvement in the planning of services related to MSW management | Value co-creation |
| Structured collaboration among actors | ||
| Outcome of joint collaborative activity |
| First-order themes | Second-order themes | Aggregate dimensions |
|---|---|---|
| Position in the recycling value chain | Actor network role | Connecting actors |
| Unique challenges | ||
| Specific responsibilities | Digital technology as a connector | |
| Identified different actors’ needs | Interest in DP | Informing actors |
| Actors’ expectations on DPs | ||
| Specific services used | Collection and delivery of data through the DP | |
| Importance of collaboration | Drivers and barriers connected to actors’ engagement | Mobilizing actors |
| Active involvement of citizens and business actors | ||
| Willingness to use digital technology (i.e. the DP-related app) | ||
| Key motivations for using the DP-related app | Actors’ engagement dynamics | |
| Timeline of interest in tech solutions | ||
| Notifications (in the form of pictures) from citizens about product characteristics | Data and knowledge sharing | Integrating data set and software |
| Waste consortia’s contribution in terms of product materials | ||
| Provision of data by municipalities and waste management companies | Brokerage process | |
| Integration of user knowledge | Co-implementation of MSW service delivery | Value co-production |
| Resources blended in co-production program | ||
| Process efficiency | Tangible benefits | Economic value |
| Revenue generation | ||
| Cost reduction | ||
| Awareness | Intangible benefits | Social value |
| Stewardship | ||
| Satisfaction | ||
| Loyalty | ||
| Social health risk reduction | ||
| Fewer resources used for alternative communication means | Tangible benefits | Environmental value |
| Less abandoned waste/littering | ||
| Higher recycling rate | ||
| Engaging citizens beyond service delivery | Citizens’ involvement in the planning of services related to MSW management | Value co-creation |
| Structured collaboration among actors | ||
| Outcome of joint collaborative activity |