Table 4

Correlations between the Rapport-Pro as a whole, its five components and the construct validity scales

Rapport-Pro
Construct validity scalesRapport as a wholeMutual connectionPaying attentionBuilding a relationshipBeing approachableBeing professional
Duke et al. (2018) RS3i0.89**0.86**0.87**0.84**0.84**0.85**
Attentiveness0.86**0.80**0.87**0.81**0.82**0.80**
Respect/trust0.77**0.73**0.74**0.73**0.70**0.78**
Expertise0.87**0.84**0.83**0.81**0.81**0.85**
Cultural similarity0.24**0.27**0.23**0.23**0.23**0.18*
Connected flow0.85**0.83**0.82**0.80**0.80**0.80**
Commitment to share0.52**0.51**0.47**0.46**0.49**0.52**
Vallano and Schreiber Compo (2015) IIQ0.88**0.83**0.84**0.83**0.84**0.83**
Interaction subscale0.87**0.83**0.83**0.81**0.82**0.81**
Interviewer subscale0.86**0.80**0.83**0.81**0.81**0.82**
Watson and Clark (1994) PANAS-X
Hostility

−0.14**

−0.11*

−0.14**

−0.11**

−0.14**

−0.18**
Attentiveness0.73**0.69**0.71**0.65**0.68**0.71**
Serenity0.69**0.67**0.66**0.60**0.64**0.69**
Ohanian (1990) CEPTES
Perceived trust
0.71**0.65**0.69**0.65**0.67**0.72**
Perceived expertise0.82**0.78**0.79**0.76**0.77**0.78**
Fassaert et al. (2007) ALOS0.85**0.79**0.84**0.80**0.80**0.81**

Note(s):

Rapport-Pro = The Rapport-Pro. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.001

Source(s): Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal