Table 5.

EFA of barriers to adopting hidden emergency exits

BarriersComponentExtraction
1234567
Lack of evidence on reliability and performance     0.580 0.677
Technical skills for constructing the exits     0.737 0.723
Fewer HEE adoptions due to a limited number of design types     0.560 0.665
Lack of knowledge on HEEs    0.599  0.624
Risk of using HEEs    0.693  0.630
Limited understanding of the product quality    0.761  0.723
Higher production cost 0.659     0.624
Uncertainties of the market 0.759     0.669
Lack of financial resources 0.692     0.651
Lack of government policy 0.742     0.676
Lack of government agencies’ support and enforcement      0.7790.768
Amendment of the national building codes      0.8110.768
Age of the occupants0.745      0.621
Education level0.705      0.700
Living condition0.674      0.653
Gender of the occupants0.672      0.635
Race/ethnicity of the occupants0.633      0.612
Types of buildings   0.620   0.563
Location of exit doors   0.743   0.811
Evacuation procedures in a facility   0.759   0.795
Lack of technology research  0.628    0.610
Lack of investment in technology  0.614    0.641
Complexity of the technology  0.779    0.713
Knowledge of technology  0.553    0.615
Credibility of the technology  0.759    0.670
Total variance explained
Eigenvalue8.8461.8791.6151.2491.1331.1001.016 
Eigenvalue AR3.2282.9312.6352.4502.1481.9761.470 
% of variance12.91311.72310.5409.8018.5937.9035.880 
Cumulative %12.91324.63635.17644.97753.57061.47267.352 
KMO0.878       
Bartlett’s test of sphericity
Approx. Chi-square3,032.843       
df300       
p-value0.000       

Note(s): KMO = Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin; extraction method = principal component analysis; rotation method = varimax with kaiser normalisation; a. rotation converged in seven iterations; AR = after rotation

Source(s): Fieldwork, 2024

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options