Table 6.

Hypothesised direct relationships

H. no.CommentsPathsRegression estimatePRemarks
H1Positive  significantOccupational stress → adaptive coping0.0830.502H1 rejected
H2Positive  significantOccupational stress → maladaptive coping0.341***H2 supported
H3Positive significantMaladaptive coping → adaptive coping0.1900.047H3 supported
H4Negative significantOccupational stress → well-being−0.411***H4 supported
H5Negative significantMaladaptive coping → well-being−0.0190.767H5 rejected
H6Positive  significantAdaptive coping → well-being0.2170.013H6 supported
Notes:

Model fitness: x2/df = 1.684; CFI = 0.928; RMSEA = 0.058; NFI = 0.842; RFI = 0.808; IFI = 0.929; TLI = 0.912 and CN = p < 0.05

Source: Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options