Rescaled part-worthsa,b of attribute levels for the archetypical preference classes
| Career-oriented type (n = 61) auc p = 0.95 | Job-oriented type (n = 171) auc p = 0.95 | Totala (n = 232) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attributes | Levels | Rescaledb part-worth estimates | Relative importanced | Rank | Rescaledb part-worth estimates | Relative importanced | Rank | Rescaledb part-worth estimates | Relative importanced | Rank |
| Company description and job design | (1) competitive company and process-oriented employee for varied tasks | 31.82 | 20.1 | 4 | 71.44 | 45.3 | 2 | 80.00 | 28.2 | 2 |
| (2) client-oriented company and expert for demanding responsibilities | 40.68 | 29.40 | 32.95 | |||||||
| (3) company with tradition and team member with good demeanor | 9.11 | 0.36 | 0 | |||||||
| Salary and bonus | (1) job tenure and company performance | 69.23 | 31.9 | 1 | 20.63 | 36.3 | 3 | 23.66 | 18.4 | 3 |
| (2) qualification and clients consulted | 38.60 | 1.99 | 0 | |||||||
| (3) fringe benefits and team performance | 19.19 | 58.83 | 52.08 | |||||||
| Work climate | (1) structured work and strong corporate culture | 48.95 | 20.6 | 3 | 21.66 | 58.5 | 1 | 25.92 | 35.5 | 1 |
| (2) self-determined work and enthusiasm | 29.11 | 93.93 | 100.86 | |||||||
| (3) work-life balance and friendly climate | 16.72 | 2.30 | 0 | |||||||
| Training and development | (1) in-house training and in-house career | 18.62 | 27.4 | 2 | 55.29 | 33.3 | 4 | 50.87 | 17.9 | 4 |
| (2) professional training and expertise | 17.53 | 41.12 | 33.65 | |||||||
| (3) on-the-job training and personal development | 60.43 | 3.05 | 0 | |||||||
| Career-oriented type ( | Job-oriented type ( | Totala ( | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attributes | Levels | Rescaledb part-worth estimates | Relative importanced | Rank | Rescaledb part-worth estimates | Relative importanced | Rank | Rescaledb part-worth estimates | Relative importanced | Rank |
| Company description and job design | (1) competitive company and process-oriented employee for varied tasks | 31.82 | 20.1 | 4 | 71.44 | 45.3 | 2 | 80.00 | 28.2 | 2 |
| (2) client-oriented company and expert for demanding responsibilities | 40.68 | 29.40 | 32.95 | |||||||
| (3) company with tradition and team member with good demeanor | 9.11 | 0.36 | 0 | |||||||
| Salary and bonus | (1) job tenure and company performance | 69.23 | 31.9 | 1 | 20.63 | 36.3 | 3 | 23.66 | 18.4 | 3 |
| (2) qualification and clients consulted | 38.60 | 1.99 | 0 | |||||||
| (3) fringe benefits and team performance | 19.19 | 58.83 | 52.08 | |||||||
| Work climate | (1) structured work and strong corporate culture | 48.95 | 20.6 | 3 | 21.66 | 58.5 | 1 | 25.92 | 35.5 | 1 |
| (2) self-determined work and enthusiasm | 29.11 | 93.93 | 100.86 | |||||||
| (3) work-life balance and friendly climate | 16.72 | 2.30 | 0 | |||||||
| Training and development | (1) in-house training and in-house career | 18.62 | 27.4 | 2 | 55.29 | 33.3 | 4 | 50.87 | 17.9 | 4 |
| (2) professional training and expertise | 17.53 | 41.12 | 33.65 | |||||||
| (3) on-the-job training and personal development | 60.43 | 3.05 | 0 | |||||||
Note(s): a Based on the 232 respondents remaining after elimination of seven respondents due to missing values and implausible answers in the socio-demographic variables
b Arithmetic mean of rescaled part-worths per cluster. The part-worth estimates are rescaled so that the sum of the part-worth values across the three attributes for each respondent equals 400. It does not affect the magnitude of any part-worth, but provides a common scale across all part-worth values for comparison across attributes and respondents
c Approximately unbiased p-values over 95% indicate that the cluster are strongly supported by the data
d Arithmetic mean of relative importance of each attribute per cluster. The relative importance of each attribute reflects how much a job attribute influences the choice of a job profile. Importance weights are calculated by computing the difference between the largest and the smallest part-worth for each attribute, summing the differences, and normalizing to 100. Attribute importance scores sum up to 100 across all three attributes for each respondent
Model Fit: likelihood ratio statistic = 1,494.67, df = 10, p ≤ 0.001; McFadden pseudo R2 = 0.472
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.