Bounds test for co-integration relationship (closing price)
| . | Critical value bounds of the F-statistic: Intercept and no trend (case II) . | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K . | 90% level . | 95% level . | 99% level . | |||
| 7 | I(0) | I(1) | I(0) | I(1) | I(0) | I(1) |
| 5.59 | 6.26 | 6.56 | 7.3 | 8.74 | 9.63 | |
| Calculated F-Statistic | 15.16445*** | |||||
| . | Critical value bounds of the F-statistic: Intercept and no trend (case II) . | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K . | 90% level . | 95% level . | 99% level . | |||
| 7 | I(0) | I(1) | I(0) | I(1) | I(0) | I(1) |
| 5.59 | 6.26 | 6.56 | 7.3 | 8.74 | 9.63 | |
| Calculated F-Statistic | 15.16445*** | |||||
Model criteria/goodness of fit (closing price)
| Statistic . | Value . | Statistic . | Value . |
|---|---|---|---|
| R-squared | 0.937704 | Mean dependent var | 6,907.006 |
| Adjusted R-squared | 0.936255 | S.D. dependent var | 329.4274 |
| S.E. of regression | 83.17276 | Akaike info criterion | 11.70756 |
| Sum squared resid | 1,189,846 | Schwarz criterion | 11.79728 |
| Log likelihood | −1031.119 | Hannan–Quinn criterion | 11.74395 |
| F-statistic | 647.2555 | Durbin–Watson stat | 2.003219 |
| Prob(F-statistic) | 0.000000 | ||
| Statistic . | Value . | Statistic . | Value . |
|---|---|---|---|
| R-squared | 0.937704 | Mean dependent var | 6,907.006 |
| Adjusted R-squared | 0.936255 | S.D. dependent var | 329.4274 |
| S.E. of regression | 83.17276 | Akaike info criterion | 11.70756 |
| Sum squared resid | 1,189,846 | Schwarz criterion | 11.79728 |
| Log likelihood | −1031.119 | Hannan–Quinn criterion | 11.74395 |
| F-statistic | 647.2555 | Durbin–Watson stat | 2.003219 |
| Prob(F-statistic) | 0.000000 | ||
Autocorrelation test (closing price)
| . | AC . | PAC . | Q-Stat . | Prob* . |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | −0.013 | −0.013 | 0.0327 | 0.856 |
| 2 | −0.071 | −0.071 | 0.9406 | 0.625 |
| 3 | −0.033 | −0.035 | 1.1386 | 0.768 |
| 4 | 0.107 | 0.102 | 3.2420 | 0.518 |
| 5 | −0.022 | −0.024 | 3.3320 | 0.649 |
| 6 | −0.049 | −0.037 | 3.7706 | 0.708 |
| . | AC . | PAC . | Q-Stat . | Prob* . |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | −0.013 | −0.013 | 0.0327 | 0.856 |
| 2 | −0.071 | −0.071 | 0.9406 | 0.625 |
| 3 | −0.033 | −0.035 | 1.1386 | 0.768 |
| 4 | 0.107 | 0.102 | 3.2420 | 0.518 |
| 5 | −0.022 | −0.024 | 3.3320 | 0.649 |
| 6 | −0.049 | −0.037 | 3.7706 | 0.708 |
Bounds test for co-integration relationship (EUR/GBP)
| . | Critical value bounds of the F-statistic: intercept and no trend (case II) . | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K . | 90% level . | 95% level . | 99% level . | |||
| 7 | I(0) | I(1) | I(0) | I(1) | I(0) | I(1) |
| 5.59 | 6.26 | 6.56 | 7.3 | 8.74 | 9.63 | |
| Calculated F-Statistic | 30.7909*** | |||||
| . | Critical value bounds of the F-statistic: intercept and no trend (case II) . | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K . | 90% level . | 95% level . | 99% level . | |||
| 7 | I(0) | I(1) | I(0) | I(1) | I(0) | I(1) |
| 5.59 | 6.26 | 6.56 | 7.3 | 8.74 | 9.63 | |
| Calculated F-Statistic | 30.7909*** | |||||
Model criteria/goodness of fit (EUR/GBP)
| Statistic . | Value . | Statistic . | Value . |
|---|---|---|---|
| R-squared | 0.377874 | Mean dependent var | 0.855048 |
| Adjusted R-squared | 0.367147 | S.D. dependent var | 0.018020 |
| S.E. of regression | 0.014335 | Akaike info criterion | −5.630011 |
| Sum squared resid | 0.035756 | Schwarz criterion | −5.558511 |
| Log likelihood | 505.0710 | Hannan–Quinn criterion | −5.601016 |
| F-statistic | 35.22865 | Durbin–Watson stat | 2.022121 |
| Prob(F-statistic) | 0.000000 |
| Statistic . | Value . | Statistic . | Value . |
|---|---|---|---|
| R-squared | 0.377874 | Mean dependent var | 0.855048 |
| Adjusted R-squared | 0.367147 | S.D. dependent var | 0.018020 |
| S.E. of regression | 0.014335 | Akaike info criterion | −5.630011 |
| Sum squared resid | 0.035756 | Schwarz criterion | −5.558511 |
| Log likelihood | 505.0710 | Hannan–Quinn criterion | −5.601016 |
| F-statistic | 35.22865 | Durbin–Watson stat | 2.022121 |
| Prob(F-statistic) | 0.000000 |
Autocorrelation test (EUR/GBP)
| . | AC . | PAC . | Q-Stat . | Prob* . |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.157 | 0.157 | 4.4710 | 0.034 |
| 2 | −0.102 | −0.130 | 6.3650 | 0.041 |
| 3 | −0.097 | −0.061 | 8.0967 | 0.044 |
| 4 | 0.033 | 0.049 | 8.2972 | 0.081 |
| 5 | −0.055 | −0.091 | 8.8564 | 0.115 |
| 6 | −0.064 | −0.039 | 9.6155 | 0.142 |
| . | AC . | PAC . | Q-Stat . | Prob* . |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.157 | 0.157 | 4.4710 | 0.034 |
| 2 | −0.102 | −0.130 | 6.3650 | 0.041 |
| 3 | −0.097 | −0.061 | 8.0967 | 0.044 |
| 4 | 0.033 | 0.049 | 8.2972 | 0.081 |
| 5 | −0.055 | −0.091 | 8.8564 | 0.115 |
| 6 | −0.064 | −0.039 | 9.6155 | 0.142 |
Bounds test for co-integration relationship (USD/GBP)
| . | Critical value bounds of the F-statistic: Intercept and no trend (case II) . | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K . | 90% level . | 95% level . | 99% level . | |||
| 7 | I(0) | I(1) | I(0) | I(1) | I(0) | I(1) |
| 5.59 | 6.26 | 6.56 | 7.3 | 8.74 | 9.63 | |
| Calculated F-Statistic | 2.0678 | |||||
| . | Critical value bounds of the F-statistic: Intercept and no trend (case II) . | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K . | 90% level . | 95% level . | 99% level . | |||
| 7 | I(0) | I(1) | I(0) | I(1) | I(0) | I(1) |
| 5.59 | 6.26 | 6.56 | 7.3 | 8.74 | 9.63 | |
| Calculated F-Statistic | 2.0678 | |||||
Model criteria/goodness of Fit (USD/GBP)
| Statistic . | Value . | Statistic . | Value . |
|---|---|---|---|
| R-squared | 0.961901 | Mean dependent var | 0.762102 |
| Adjusted R-squared | 0.961020 | S.D. dependent var | 0.038186 |
| S.E. of regression | 0.007539 | Akaike info criterion | −6.909746 |
| Sum squared resid | 0.009833 | Schwarz criterion | −6.820371 |
| Log likelihood | 619.9674 | Hannan–Quinn criterion | −6.873502 |
| F-statistic | 1091.958 | Durbin–Watson stat | 1.904602 |
| Prob(F-statistic) | 0.000000 | ||
| Statistic . | Value . | Statistic . | Value . |
|---|---|---|---|
| R-squared | 0.961901 | Mean dependent var | 0.762102 |
| Adjusted R-squared | 0.961020 | S.D. dependent var | 0.038186 |
| S.E. of regression | 0.007539 | Akaike info criterion | −6.909746 |
| Sum squared resid | 0.009833 | Schwarz criterion | −6.820371 |
| Log likelihood | 619.9674 | Hannan–Quinn criterion | −6.873502 |
| F-statistic | 1091.958 | Durbin–Watson stat | 1.904602 |
| Prob(F-statistic) | 0.000000 | ||
Autocorrelation test (USD/GBP)
| . | AC . | PAC . | Q-Stat . | Prob* . |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.135 | 0.135 | 3.2888 | 0.070 |
| 2 | −0.024 | −0.043 | 3.3968 | 0.183 |
| 3 | −0.018 | −0.009 | 3.4588 | 0.326 |
| 4 | 0.075 | 0.079 | 4.4899 | 0.344 |
| 5 | 0.050 | 0.028 | 4.9501 | 0.422 |
| 6 | 0.134 | 0.131 | 8.2922 | 0.217 |
| . | AC . | PAC . | Q-Stat . | Prob* . |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.135 | 0.135 | 3.2888 | 0.070 |
| 2 | −0.024 | −0.043 | 3.3968 | 0.183 |
| 3 | −0.018 | −0.009 | 3.4588 | 0.326 |
| 4 | 0.075 | 0.079 | 4.4899 | 0.344 |
| 5 | 0.050 | 0.028 | 4.9501 | 0.422 |
| 6 | 0.134 | 0.131 | 8.2922 | 0.217 |
Granger causality test
| Pairwise Granger causality tests | ||
| Date: 04/16/25 Time: 11:45 | ||
| Sample: 6/23/2016 7/29/2022 | ||
| Lags: 2 | ||
| Pairwise Granger causality tests | ||
| Date: 04/16/25 Time: 11:45 | ||
| Sample: 6/23/2016 7/29/2022 | ||
| Lags: 2 | ||
| Prob . | F-statistic . | Obs . | Null hypothesis . |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.8339 | 0.18178 | 177 | EUR_GBP does not Granger Cause SCORE01 |
| 0.0000 | 9.83723 | SCORE01 does not Granger Cause EUR_GDP | |
| 0.9337 | 0.06867 | 177 | USD_TO_GBP does not Granger Cause SCORE01 |
| 0.0270 | 3.69012 | SCORE01 does not Granger Cause USD_TO_GDP | |
| 0.5014 | 0.69318 | 177 | CLOSE_PRICE does not Granger Cause SCORE01 |
| 0.0000 | 10.2989 | SCORE01 does not Granger Cause CLOSE_PRICE | |
| Prob . | F-statistic . | Obs . | Null hypothesis . |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.8339 | 0.18178 | 177 | EUR_GBP does not Granger Cause SCORE01 |
| 0.0000 | 9.83723 | SCORE01 does not Granger Cause EUR_GDP | |
| 0.9337 | 0.06867 | 177 | USD_TO_GBP does not Granger Cause SCORE01 |
| 0.0270 | 3.69012 | SCORE01 does not Granger Cause USD_TO_GDP | |
| 0.5014 | 0.69318 | 177 | CLOSE_PRICE does not Granger Cause SCORE01 |
| 0.0000 | 10.2989 | SCORE01 does not Granger Cause CLOSE_PRICE | |
The line graph displays three data series across three time periods: “2016”, “2021”, and “2022”. The three series are identified in the legend at the bottom as “Residual”, “Actual”, and “Fitted”. The horizontal axis is marked with time intervals across the years “2016”, “2021”, and “2022”. The axis includes “M 7” and “M 8” for “2016”; “M 1”, “M 2”, and “M 3” for “2021”; and “M 3”, “M 6”, and “M 7” for “2022”. The graph features two vertical axes. The vertical axis on the left ranges from negative 400 to 600 in increments of 200 units and corresponds to the line labeled “Residual”. The “Residual” line starts in “2016” at approximately negative 120, fluctuates with high-frequency volatility between negative 200 and 200 through “2021”, reaches a significant positive peak of approximately 450 in early “2022” at the “M 3” mark, and ends in “2022” at the “M 7” mark at approximately 80. The vertical axis on the right ranges from 5,600 to 8,000 in increments of 400 units and corresponds to the lines labeled “Actual” and “Fitted”. The “Actual” line starts in “2016” at approximately 6,050, increases to approximately 6,800 by “M 3” of “2021”, experiences a sharp, synchronized increase with the “Fitted” line to peak at approximately 7,600 in early “2022” at the “M 3” mark, and ends in “2022” at the “M 7” mark at approximately 7,400. The “Fitted” line follows a nearly identical path, starting in “2016” at approximately 6,000, increasing through “2021”, peaking in early “2022” at approximately 7,600, and ending in “2022” at approximately 7,450. Note: All numerical data values are approximated.Actual, fitted, residual plot for the closing price
The line graph displays three data series across three time periods: “2016”, “2021”, and “2022”. The three series are identified in the legend at the bottom as “Residual”, “Actual”, and “Fitted”. The horizontal axis is marked with time intervals across the years “2016”, “2021”, and “2022”. The axis includes “M 7” and “M 8” for “2016”; “M 1”, “M 2”, and “M 3” for “2021”; and “M 3”, “M 6”, and “M 7” for “2022”. The graph features two vertical axes. The vertical axis on the left ranges from negative 400 to 600 in increments of 200 units and corresponds to the line labeled “Residual”. The “Residual” line starts in “2016” at approximately negative 120, fluctuates with high-frequency volatility between negative 200 and 200 through “2021”, reaches a significant positive peak of approximately 450 in early “2022” at the “M 3” mark, and ends in “2022” at the “M 7” mark at approximately 80. The vertical axis on the right ranges from 5,600 to 8,000 in increments of 400 units and corresponds to the lines labeled “Actual” and “Fitted”. The “Actual” line starts in “2016” at approximately 6,050, increases to approximately 6,800 by “M 3” of “2021”, experiences a sharp, synchronized increase with the “Fitted” line to peak at approximately 7,600 in early “2022” at the “M 3” mark, and ends in “2022” at the “M 7” mark at approximately 7,400. The “Fitted” line follows a nearly identical path, starting in “2016” at approximately 6,000, increasing through “2021”, peaking in early “2022” at approximately 7,600, and ending in “2022” at approximately 7,450. Note: All numerical data values are approximated.Actual, fitted, residual plot for the closing price
The line graph displays three data series across three time periods: “2016”, “2021”, and “2022”. The three series are identified in the legend at the bottom as “Residual”, “Actual”, and “Fitted”. The horizontal axis is marked with time intervals across the years “2016”, “2021”, and “2022”. The axis includes “M 7” and “M 8” for “2016”; “M 1”, “M 2”, and “M 3” for “2021”; and “M 3”, “M 6”, and “M 7” for “2022”. The graph features two vertical axes. The vertical axis on the left ranges from negative 400 to 600 in increments of 200 units and corresponds to the line labeled “Residual”. The “Residual” line is positioned in the lower portion of the graph, fluctuating around the 0 baseline. It shows the most significant positive spike occurring at the beginning of “2022”, reaching nearly 500, followed by a sharp drop toward negative 200. The vertical axis on the right ranges from 5,600 to 8,000 in increments of 400 units and corresponds to the lines labeled “Actual” and “Fitted”. The “Actual” and “Fitted” lines are positioned in the upper portion of the graph and follow a closely aligned path. They begin at above 6,-00 in “2016”, fluctuate between 6,400 and 6,800 through “2021”, and then show a significant upward trend at the start of “2022”, peaking near 7,600 before stabilizing between 7,200 and 7,400. Note: All numerical data values are approximated.Actual, fitted, residual plot for EUR/GBP
The line graph displays three data series across three time periods: “2016”, “2021”, and “2022”. The three series are identified in the legend at the bottom as “Residual”, “Actual”, and “Fitted”. The horizontal axis is marked with time intervals across the years “2016”, “2021”, and “2022”. The axis includes “M 7” and “M 8” for “2016”; “M 1”, “M 2”, and “M 3” for “2021”; and “M 3”, “M 6”, and “M 7” for “2022”. The graph features two vertical axes. The vertical axis on the left ranges from negative 400 to 600 in increments of 200 units and corresponds to the line labeled “Residual”. The “Residual” line is positioned in the lower portion of the graph, fluctuating around the 0 baseline. It shows the most significant positive spike occurring at the beginning of “2022”, reaching nearly 500, followed by a sharp drop toward negative 200. The vertical axis on the right ranges from 5,600 to 8,000 in increments of 400 units and corresponds to the lines labeled “Actual” and “Fitted”. The “Actual” and “Fitted” lines are positioned in the upper portion of the graph and follow a closely aligned path. They begin at above 6,-00 in “2016”, fluctuate between 6,400 and 6,800 through “2021”, and then show a significant upward trend at the start of “2022”, peaking near 7,600 before stabilizing between 7,200 and 7,400. Note: All numerical data values are approximated.Actual, fitted, residual plot for EUR/GBP
The line graph displays three data series across three time periods: “2016”, “2021”, and “2022”. The three series are identified in the legend at the bottom as “Residual”, “Actual”, and “Fitted”. The horizontal axis is marked with time intervals across the years “2016”, “2021”, and “2022”. The axis includes “M 7” and “M 8” for “2016”; “M 1”, “M 2”, and “M 3” for “2021”; and “M 3”, “M 6”, and “M 7” for “2022”. The vertical axis on the left represents “Residual” values and ranges from negative .02 to .06 in increments of .02 units. The vertical axis on the right represents values for the other series and ranges from .65 to .85 in increments of .05 units. The “Residual” line is positioned in the lower portion of the graph, fluctuating around the .00 baseline. It shows various peaks and valleys corresponding to the fluctuations in the data, with a significant positive spike occurring at the beginning of “2022” reaching nearly .04, following a previous notable drop to negative .02. The “Actual” and “Fitted” lines are positioned in the upper portion of the graph and follow a closely aligned path. They begin at approximately .75 in “2016”, show a slight downward trend toward .70 through “2021”, and then show a significant upward trend at the start of “2022”, peaking near .85 before ending slightly lower. Note: All data numerical values are approximated.Actual, fitted, residual plot for USD/GBP
The line graph displays three data series across three time periods: “2016”, “2021”, and “2022”. The three series are identified in the legend at the bottom as “Residual”, “Actual”, and “Fitted”. The horizontal axis is marked with time intervals across the years “2016”, “2021”, and “2022”. The axis includes “M 7” and “M 8” for “2016”; “M 1”, “M 2”, and “M 3” for “2021”; and “M 3”, “M 6”, and “M 7” for “2022”. The vertical axis on the left represents “Residual” values and ranges from negative .02 to .06 in increments of .02 units. The vertical axis on the right represents values for the other series and ranges from .65 to .85 in increments of .05 units. The “Residual” line is positioned in the lower portion of the graph, fluctuating around the .00 baseline. It shows various peaks and valleys corresponding to the fluctuations in the data, with a significant positive spike occurring at the beginning of “2022” reaching nearly .04, following a previous notable drop to negative .02. The “Actual” and “Fitted” lines are positioned in the upper portion of the graph and follow a closely aligned path. They begin at approximately .75 in “2016”, show a slight downward trend toward .70 through “2021”, and then show a significant upward trend at the start of “2022”, peaking near .85 before ending slightly lower. Note: All data numerical values are approximated.Actual, fitted, residual plot for USD/GBP