Strategic interpretation of thematic map quadrants
| Quadrant | Centrality (inter-cluster ties) | Density (intra-cluster ties) | Strategic interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| I. Motor themes | High | High | Well-developed and crucial: The foundation of the field; high internal coherence and strong ties to other topics |
| II. Niche themes | Low | High | Highly specialized: Coherent and mature themes, but isolated from the main research flow; specialized focus |
| III. Emerging/basic themes | Low | Low | New or foundational: Lack both internal coherence and strong external ties; topics are either too new or too broad |
| IV. Declining/specialized themes | High | Low | Bridge/transition themes: High external relevance but lack recent internal development; often act as bridges between motor and emerging themes |
| Quadrant | Centrality (inter-cluster ties) | Density (intra-cluster ties) | Strategic interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| High | High | ||
| Low | High | ||
| Low | Low | ||
| High | Low |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.