Table 3. Hypotheses results Direct... | Emerald Publishing

Table 3.

Hypotheses results

Direct effect
							95% CI
Variables			β	SE	z-value	p	LLCI	ULCI
Transactional	→	Mea	0.18	0.10	1.76	0.05	0.01	0.38
Transformational	→	Mea	0.17	0.09	1.89	0.05	0.01	0.34

Indirect effect
			Estim.	SE	S	z-value	p	LLCI	ULCI
Transactional	Aut.	Mea	0.04	0.03		1.48	0.05	0.01	0.09
Transactional	Rel	Mea	−0.01	0.03		−0.71	0.47	−0.06	0.05
Transactional	Com	Mea	0.14	0.04		2.34	0.01	0.06	0.21
Transformational	Aut	Mea	0.07	0.03		1.23	0.04	0.01	0.13
Transformational	Rel.	Mea	−0.02	0.04		−0.71	0.67	−0.10	0.07
Transformational	Com	Mea	0.14	0.04		1.05	0.01	0.05	0.23

Indirect effect
			Estim.	SE	S	z-value	p	LLCI	ULCI
Transactional	Aut.	Mea	0.04	0.03		1.48	0.05	0.01	0.09
Transactional	Rel	Mea	−0.01	0.03		−0.71	0.47	−0.06	0.05
Transactional	Com	Mea	0.14	0.04		2.34	0.01	0.06	0.21
Transformational	Aut	Mea	0.07	0.03		1.23	0.04	0.01	0.13
Transformational	Rel.	Mea	−0.02	0.04		−0.71	0.67	−0.10	0.07
Transformational	Com	Mea	0.14	0.04		1.05	0.01	0.05	0.23

Total effects
							CI 95%
			Estim.	SE	z-value	p	LLCI	ULCI
Transactional	→	Mea	0.34	0.04	3.95	0.001	0.08	0.25
Transformational	→	Mea	0.35	0.09	4.07	0.001	0.18	0.52

Note(s):

Mea = meaning; Aut = autonomy; Com = competence; Rel = relatedness

Source(s): Authors’ own work