Table 6 MGA analysis Hypotheses β AG β...

Table 6

MGA analysis

Hypotheses	β_AG	β_MF	β_SV	β diff	p-value	Result
H1: GIS → COM	0.065	0.079	0.071	0.014	0.637	n.s
H2: GES → COM	0.258	0.237	0.243	0.021	0.289	n.s
H3: GIS → SC	0.395	0.408	0.412	0.017	0.423	n.s
H4: GES → SC	0.532	0.519	0.521	0.013	0.551	n.s
H5: SC → COM	0.525	0.510	0.498	0.027	0.412	n.s

Hypotheses	β_AG	β_MF	β_SV	β diff	p-value	Result
H1: GIS → COM	0.065	0.079	0.071	0.014	0.637	n.s
H2: GES → COM	0.258	0.237	0.243	0.021	0.289	n.s
H3: GIS → SC	0.395	0.408	0.412	0.017	0.423	n.s
H4: GES → SC	0.532	0.519	0.521	0.013	0.551	n.s
H5: SC → COM	0.525	0.510	0.498	0.027	0.412	n.s

Note(s): GIS = Government Informational Support; GES = Government Experiential Support; COM = Competitiveness; SC = Strategic Capability; AG = Agriculture, MF = Manufacturing; SV = Service; n.s = Not Significant

Source(s): author’s own elaboration

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable