Table 5 Effect on endogenous constructs... | Emerald Publishing

Table 5

Effect on endogenous constructs

Endogenous constructs	R²	Q²
Hard QM practices	0.777	0.426
Administrative innovation (AI)	0.666	0.492
Technical innovation (TI)	0.778	0.488
Organizational performance	0.779	0.439

Hypothesis and relation		Direct effect	t-value (bootstrap)	Percentile 95% CI	Support
H1	Soft QM → Hard QM	0.882***	63.027	[0.858; 0.904]	Yes
H2a	Soft QM → Administrative innovation	0.555***	8.005	[0.440; 0.668]	Yes
H2b	Soft QM → Technical innovation	0.426***	7.157	[0.329;0.523]	Yes
H3a	Hard QM → Administrative innovation	0.285***	4.035	[0.169;0.400]	Yes
H3b	Hard QM → Technical innovation	0.484***	8.084	[0.386;0.582]	Yes
H4a	AI → Organizational performance	0.134**	2.496	[0.050; 0.224]	Yes
H4b	TI → Organizational performance	0.091^ns	1.319	[-0.024;0.202]	No
H5	Soft QM → Organizational performance	0.420***	7.246	[0.323;0.514]	Yes
H6	Hard QM → Organizational performance	0.288***	4.906	[0.193;0.383]	Yes

Hypothesis and relation		Direct effect	t-value (bootstrap)	Percentile 95% CI	Support
H1	Soft QM → Hard QM	0.882***	63.027	[0.858; 0.904]	Yes
H2a	Soft QM → Administrative innovation	0.555***	8.005	[0.440; 0.668]	Yes
H2b	Soft QM → Technical innovation	0.426***	7.157	[0.329;0.523]	Yes
H3a	Hard QM → Administrative innovation	0.285***	4.035	[0.169;0.400]	Yes
H3b	Hard QM → Technical innovation	0.484***	8.084	[0.386;0.582]	Yes
H4a	AI → Organizational performance	0.134**	2.496	[0.050; 0.224]	Yes
H4b	TI → Organizational performance	0.091^ns	1.319	[-0.024;0.202]	No
H5	Soft QM → Organizational performance	0.420***	7.246	[0.323;0.514]	Yes
H6	Hard QM → Organizational performance	0.288***	4.906	[0.193;0.383]	Yes

Note(s): ***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; ns: not significant