Impacts of value co-creation in the humanitarian aid context for assistive technology users
| Registration units | Context units |
|---|---|
| Partnership creation | A10: Cross-sector partnerships offer opportunities but present cultural and institutional challenges |
| A11: Donor-driven NGO funding for immediate solutions can distort an organisation’s social mission | |
| A17: Medical co-creation involves engineers, doctors and others jointly developing solutions | |
| A43: The Open AT Platform is designed for user integration | |
| A50: Co-creation uses a logical model and graphical representation to link resources, activities, results and outcomes | |
| A73: Engineer–doctor–researcher partnerships aim to create a malaria parasite-inhibiting device | |
| A80: Co-creation can mitigate stakeholder conflicts and establish effective partnerships | |
| Equity in resource application | A28: Health-care funding is primarily reactive; limited financial solutions exist for prevention and preparedness |
| A70: Using Augmented Reality and Internet of Things (IoT) for smart cities | |
| Power dynamic shift | A11: Solutions foster greater ownership and responsibility |
| A22: Social inequality threatens safety and well-being | |
| A49: Community involvement improves communication | |
| Personalisation | A9: Including end-users in production/decision-making promotes efficiency |
| A12: Use of Brain–Computer Interface (BCI) | |
| A24: Personalisation through co-development | |
| A29: Personalised toolkit for autistic individuals | |
| A51: 3D bioprinting for skin tissue | |
| A55: Co-creation through User-Centred Design | |
| A56: Wearable devices via 4D Printing | |
| A72: A digital platform for stakeholder integration | |
| A76: Wearable devices via 4D Printing | |
| Technology | A4: IoT in wearables for vital sign monitoring |
| A13: Co-creation aids in designing wearable devices for cancer prevention | |
| A24: Co-creation for AT development | |
| A32: Telemedicine for elderly care | |
| A34: AI and counterfactual simulations model | |
| A35: AI/ML in Parkinson’s detection, with co-creation uniting stakeholders | |
| A36: Blockchain and AI for data protection | |
| A45: User feedback is crucial for successful AT | |
| A47: IoT for improving traditional health care | |
| A59: IoT engages the elderly in co-creating non-invasive monitoring | |
| A71: Use of drones in HA removes barriers to use through co-creation | |
| A78: Enhancing a hybrid approach combining deep learning with mapping APIs | |
| A87: Preference for manual care creates resistance to “cold” AT versus “warm” human touch | |
| A89: Co-creation mitigates AI–human distancing |
| Registration units | Context units |
|---|---|
| A10: Cross-sector partnerships offer opportunities but present cultural and institutional challenges | |
| A11: Donor-driven | |
| A17: Medical co-creation involves engineers, doctors and others jointly developing solutions | |
| A43: The Open | |
| A50: Co-creation uses a logical model and graphical representation to link resources, activities, results and outcomes | |
| A73: Engineer–doctor–researcher partnerships aim to create a malaria parasite-inhibiting device | |
| A80: Co-creation can mitigate stakeholder conflicts and establish effective partnerships | |
| A28: Health-care funding is primarily reactive; limited financial solutions exist for prevention and preparedness | |
| A70: Using Augmented Reality and Internet of Things (IoT) for smart cities | |
| A11: Solutions foster greater ownership and responsibility | |
| A22: Social inequality threatens safety and well-being | |
| A49: Community involvement improves communication | |
| A9: Including end-users in production/decision-making promotes efficiency | |
| A12: Use of Brain–Computer Interface ( | |
| A24: Personalisation through co-development | |
| A29: Personalised toolkit for autistic individuals | |
| A51: 3D bioprinting for skin tissue | |
| A55: Co-creation through User-Centred Design | |
| A56: Wearable devices via 4D Printing | |
| A72: A digital platform for stakeholder integration | |
| A76: Wearable devices via 4D Printing | |
| A4: IoT in wearables for vital sign monitoring | |
| A13: Co-creation aids in designing wearable devices for cancer prevention | |
| A24: Co-creation for | |
| A32: Telemedicine for elderly care | |
| A34: | |
| A35: AI/ | |
| A36: Blockchain and | |
| A45: User feedback is crucial for successful | |
| A47: IoT for improving traditional health care | |
| A59: IoT engages the elderly in co-creating non-invasive monitoring | |
| A71: Use of drones in | |
| A78: Enhancing a hybrid approach combining deep learning with mapping APIs | |
| A87: Preference for manual care creates resistance to “cold” | |
| A89: Co-creation mitigates AI–human distancing |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.