Table 2

List of respondents in Phase 2

No.PositionProject Type/Nature
1Assistant Executive DirectorResource Mobilization
2Project ImplementorInstitutional Strengthening
3Project ManagerCommunity Engagement
4Project ManagerEmergency and Disaster
5Project ConsultantEmergency and Disaster
6Co-ManagerEmergency and Disaster
7Project ConsultantCommunity Engagement
8Project FacilitatorCommunity Engagement
9Project ImplementorHealth and Nutrition Intervention
10Project ImplementorCommunity Engagement
11Project ImplementorCommunity Engagement
12Project ImplementorHealth and Nutrition Intervention
13BenefactorCommunity Engagement
14Project ImplementorHealth and Nutrition Intervention
15Project ImplementorCommunity Engagement
16Project ManagerCommunity Engagement
17Vice ChairmanCommunity Engagement
18Project ManagerEmergency and Disaster
19Project ImplementorCommunity Engagement
20Training InstructorCapacity Building
21ConvenerEmergency and Disaster
22Project ConsultantCapacity Building
23LecturerCapacity Building
24Fund ManagerCommunity Engagement
Note(s):

Key takeaway: the respondent pool reflects a wide range of humanitarian roles and project types, with strong representation from community engagement and emergency response projects. This distribution highlights the diversity of operational perspectives captured in the study, while also indicating that insights may be more reflective of sectors with higher respondent concentration

Source(s): Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal