Job titles of full hybrid and nonhybrid users
| Full hybrid | Nonhybrid | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Position | Frequency | Position | Frequency |
| Project Manager | 2 | Field Work | 1 |
| Facilitator | 1 | Project Manager | 2 |
| Implementer | 3 | Benefactor | 1 |
| Convenor | 1 | Implementer | 2 |
| Fund Manager | 1 | ||
| Vice Chairman | 1 | ||
| Lecturer | 1 | ||
| Full hybrid | Nonhybrid | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Position | Frequency | Position | Frequency |
| Project Manager | 2 | Field Work | 1 |
| Facilitator | 1 | Project Manager | 2 |
| Implementer | 3 | Benefactor | 1 |
| Convenor | 1 | Implementer | 2 |
| Fund Manager | 1 | ||
| Vice Chairman | 1 | ||
| Lecturer | 1 | ||
Key takeaway: hybrid and nonhybrid users appear across a variety of roles, with no clear concentration of hybrid adoption within any specific job category. This suggests that the use of hybrid PMM is not driven by hierarchical position or job function but may instead reflect organizational norms, project type or contextual demands. The absence of strong role-based patterns supports the study’s finding that hybrid adoption is widespread and not limited to particular professional groups
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.