Table 5

Number of priorities per phase between full hybrid and nonhybrid users

Respondent no.Phase 1Phase 2Phase 3Phase 4Phase 5Phase 6Use of hybrid
124545452
234353312
243333332
251112221
261333332
272554442
282222121
313434332
321212211
333534332
343343332
362222221
383334302
392222121
401111111
413111132
Note(s):

Key takeaway: full hybrid users generally listed a greater number of priorities across project phases compared to nonhybrid users, suggesting that teams working in more complex or multi-demand environments may be more inclined to adopt hybrid methodologies. However, the variability in responses across phases also indicates that priority-setting is highly context dependent, reinforcing the need to interpret these patterns as exploratory rather than definitive

Source(s): Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal