Number of priorities per phase between full hybrid and nonhybrid users
| Respondent no. | Phase 1 | Phase 2 | Phase 3 | Phase 4 | Phase 5 | Phase 6 | Use of hybrid |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 2 |
| 23 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 |
| 24 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
| 25 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 26 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
| 27 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 |
| 28 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| 31 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
| 32 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| 33 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
| 34 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
| 36 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 38 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| 39 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| 40 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 41 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 |
| Respondent no. | Phase 1 | Phase 2 | Phase 3 | Phase 4 | Phase 5 | Phase 6 | Use of hybrid |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 2 |
| 23 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 |
| 24 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
| 25 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 26 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
| 27 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 |
| 28 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| 31 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
| 32 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| 33 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
| 34 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
| 36 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 38 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| 39 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| 40 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 41 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 |
Key takeaway: full hybrid users generally listed a greater number of priorities across project phases compared to nonhybrid users, suggesting that teams working in more complex or multi-demand environments may be more inclined to adopt hybrid methodologies. However, the variability in responses across phases also indicates that priority-setting is highly context dependent, reinforcing the need to interpret these patterns as exploratory rather than definitive
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.