Table 1.

Comparative analysis of state-of-the-art cybersecurity frameworks

StudyMethodologyObjectiveLimitations addressed by our work
Nguyen et al. (2021) Survey on FL for IoTReviews FL challenges in IoTTheoretical survey; does not propose or validate an integrated solution
Guo et al. (2024) FTLIntrusion detection for IoTLacks mechanism to ensure node trust or address zero-day threats
Anitha and Murugan (2024) FL + BlockchainSecure data sharingDoes not leverage GenAI or FTL for non-IID data handling
Kumar et al. (2024) FCD (FL + crypto)Unified defense against utility and privacy attacksFocuses on cryptographic defenses; lacks GenAI for synthetic data or FTL adaptation
Anitha and Murugan (2024) FL + BlockchainPrivacy-preserving IoT securityFocuses on privacy/integrity; omits zero-day generation and adaptive modelling
Xie et al. (2024) PoisonedFL attackDemonstrates model poisoning attackHighlights vulnerability but does not offer a defensive framework
Our workFTL + GenAI + BlockchainPrivacy-preserving, adaptive and robust IDSHandles non-IID data, zero-day threats and model poisoning through integrated approach

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal