Table 3

Results of hypotheses testing and explained variance

Hypothesized relationshipsStandardized path coefficientSupported or not supportedR square construct
LTC residents   
H1 Psychological comfort → Acceptance0.54***Supported0.29
H2 Acceptance → Attentive engagement0.77***Supported0.59
H3 Attentive engagement → Effort willingness0.70***Supported0.49
Human FLE
H1 Psychological comfort → Acceptance0.88***Supported0.77
H2 Acceptance → Attentive engagement0.89***Supported0.78
H3 Attentive engagement → Effort willingness0.88***Supported0.78
Notes:

*p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001; NS = not significant

Source: Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal