Table 4 Kruskal-Wallis test results and...

Table 4

Kruskal-Wallis test results and post-hoc pairwise comparisons by legal form

Indicator	TI	SF	CI	NCI	DE	IC
Kruskal-Wallis H	90.310	90.310	56.439	13.115	90.303	31.561
Asymp. Sig	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.001	0.000	0.000
Pairwise diff^a	PLC-P; PrLC-P	PLC-P; PrLC-P	PrLC-P; PrLC-PLC	PLC-P; PrLC-P	PLC-P; PrLC-P	PrLC-P

Indicator	TI	SF	CI	NCI	DE	IC
Kruskal-Wallis H	90.310	90.310	56.439	13.115	90.303	31.561
Asymp. Sig	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.001	0.000	0.000
Pairwise diff^a	PLC-P; PrLC-P	PLC-P; PrLC-P	PrLC-P; PrLC-PLC	PLC-P; PrLC-P	PLC-P; PrLC-P	PrLC-P

Indicator	IB	DCF	FI	EL	NCAC	Ins
Kruskal-Wallis H	3.625	5.095	81.596	90.303	4.498	14.055
Asymp. Sig	0.163	0.078	0.000	0.000	0.105	0.001
Pairwise diff^a	–	–	PLC-P; PrLC-P	PLC-P; PrLC-P	–	PrLC-P; PrLC-PLC

Note(s)

Significant pairwise differences based on Dunn-Bonferroni post-hoc test (⁠ $p < 0.05$ ⁠). PLC Public limited enterprises; PrLC Private limited enterprises; p Partnerships

Source(s): own elaboration

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable